Teams

Yadkin/Hartsough/40 3.5 Singles

2025 Yadkin Valley Singles 40 & Over · Women 3.5 - Thursday Night

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-14vs Yadkin/Howard-Talbott/40 3.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesNancy Hart vs Alyssa Howards6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesFelice Manget Harvey vs Deana Georgitis7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-06vs Yadkin/Haynes/40+ 3.5 SinglesLost 03
L#1 SinglesFelice Manget Harvey vs Laura Varsik1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAmy Starnes vs JoAnn White1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesDaughn Eagan vs Danielle Wright2-6, 2-6
2025-08-01vs Yadkin/Haynes/40+ 3.5 SinglesLost 02
L#1 SinglesDonna Johnson vs Clarissa Tatum0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesNancy Hart vs Kristi Nicholson6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-07-26vs Yadkin/Howard-Talbott/40 3.5Split 11
L#1 SinglesDaughn Eagan vs Christina Soriano2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesNancy Hart vs Deana Georgitis6-3, 6-1
2025-07-21vs Yadkin/Haynes/40+ 3.5 SinglesLost 03
L#1 SinglesDonna Johnson vs Lindsay Reynolds2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAmy Starnes vs JoAnn White4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesDaughn Eagan vs Kristi Nicholson2-6, 3-6
2025-06-28vs Yadkin/Haynes/40+ 3.5 SinglesLost 03
L#1 SinglesFelice Manget Harvey vs Kim Haynes3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDaughn Eagan vs Lindsay Reynolds1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAmy Starnes vs Sarah Eugenia Gallo2-6, 0-6
2025-06-15vs Yadkin/Howard-Talbott/40 3.5Won 20
W#2 SinglesNancy Hart vs Samantha Talbott6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesDonna Johnson vs Alyssa Howards7-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 - Thursday Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Rebecca Hartsough
published
Daughn Eagan
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Nancy Hart
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.10
Felice Manget Harvey
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.96
Beth Campbell
published 3.5
2.95
Amy Starnes
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.78
Donna Johnson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Hart + Donna Johnson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Hartsough
40W–34L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
3.5
Daughn Eagan
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Hart
33W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Felice Manget Harvey
7W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Beth Campbell
1W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.96
3.5
Amy Starnes
7W–26L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
Donna Johnson
21W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.