Teams

CRRC-Bays

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

2 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Steve Swan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Daniel Lei
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2019-03-23Won 20
W#1 DoublesPeter Foley / Steve Swan vs Paul Barner / Jeff Anhaltzer6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAndy Moos / Daniel Lei vs James Gillespie / George Husbands6-1, 6-1
2019-03-02Split 11
W#1 DoublesSteve Swan / David Bender vs Rob Dramov / Bill Christensen1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDaniel Lei vs Michael Cobb6-3, 6-0
2019-02-23Lost 01
L#2 SinglesDaniel Lei vs Wes Schalk6-0, 6-3
2019-02-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesPeter Foley / Steve Swan vs Srinivasa Kanamatha / Suresh Patibandla6-4, 6-2
2019-02-02Split 11
W#1 DoublesPeter Foley / Steve Swan vs Chris Collins / ANTHONY PEPE7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRodney Jacobs / Daniel Lei vs John Jay / Alex McIntosh6-4, 6-1
2019-01-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesPeter Foley / Steve Swan vs Stephen Marsh / Tim Fernstrom6-3, 6-2
2019-01-13Split 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Bender / Steve Swan vs Peter Singson / William Allers6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTodd Iselin / Daniel Lei vs John Jay / ANTHONY PEPE7-6, 7-5
2019-01-05Split 11
W#1 DoublesPeter Foley / Steve Swan vs Gabriel Weaver / James Stenger6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBernie Atoigue / Daniel Lei vs Stephen Osborne / George Husbands - *6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Steve Swan
28W–51L career
0%42%58%
3.65
3.5
Daniel Lei
10W–15L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.