Teams

Sandy Springs (Susan Sullivan)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.5 Women (Michelle Wilkinson)

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-01-04vs Sugar Creek (Dannita Stanley)*Lost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Fuqua / Jennifer Maceyko vs Nozipho Lewis / Patricia Clevenger5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Ager / Rebekah Hollingsworth vs Leteaser Koita / Julia Bolden2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Sullivan / Holly Pelfrey vs Cee Jai Jones / Yvonne Hospedales6-3, 3-6, 6-3
L#4 DoublesKelly Miller / Stephanie Jernigan vs Dannita Stanley / Jennifer Hornsby0-6, 6-3, 6-3
2024-11-23vs Sandy Springs (Katelyn Peterson)*Lost 04
L#1 DoublesCourtney Hendrix / Jennifer Maceyko vs Kelsey O'Regan / Tracey Yang1-6, 6-3, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Cashwell vs Claire Bailey5-7, 6-3, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrenda Conley / Jennifer Fuqua vs Bailey McDaniel / Gloria Yeh2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCaroline Southerland / Rebekah Hollingsworth vs Lindsay Eckhaus / Emily Hood4-6, 4-6
2024-11-09vs Sugar Creek (Dannita Stanley)*Split 22
L#1 DoublesAshley Grattan-Smith / Nancy Ager vs Shanavia Brannam / Leteaser Koita0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEleanor Walling / Rebekah Hollingsworth vs Nozipho Lewis / Becky Ellis1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Jernigan / Courtney Hendrix vs Dannita Stanley / Tara McGowan2-6, 6-3, 7-6
W#4 DoublesJennifer Fuqua / Sarah Cashwell vs Cee Jai Jones / Yvonne Hospedales6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women (Michelle Wilkinson) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Stephanie Jernigan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Ashley Grattan-Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Courtney Hendrix
published 4.5
4.24
Holly Pelfrey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.22
Michelle Hewitson
published
4.20
Brenda Conley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Sarah Cashwell
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.16
Caroline Southerland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Jennifer Maceyko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.14
Jennifer Fuqua
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.13
Lori Brochin
published
3.88
Rebekah Hollingsworth
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Eleanor Walling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Nancy Ager
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Hewitson + Holly Pelfrey2346% games−1.5% vs expected
Rebekah Hollingsworth + Nancy Ager033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Jernigan
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
4.34
4.5
Ashley Grattan-Smith
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Courtney Hendrix
15W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Holly Pelfrey
6W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
Michelle Hewitson
29W–28L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Brenda Conley
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
4.20
Sarah Cashwell
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Caroline Southerland
12W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
4.16
Jennifer Maceyko
10W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
4.16
Jennifer Fuqua
12W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
4.14
Lori Brochin
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.13
Rebekah Hollingsworth
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.88
Eleanor Walling
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.84
Nancy Ager
16W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.