Teams

6-Mlong-Eno-2.5Tri-Level

Tri-Level-18 & Over · 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 Women Weekend

12 players · average NTRP 2.89 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-22vs 8-NWatts-Eno-TriWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Edmunds / Judith Hagopian-Edwards vs Nakisha Boulware Watts / Beatrice Allen6-1, 6-1
2023-06-25vs 1-DBaker-EnoLost 01
L#3 DoublesHannah Gahagan / Judith Hagopian-Edwards vs Tina Prinstein / Kelly Swisher2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-06-18vs 3-TLangino-SVCLost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Dingler / Kari Lovetinsky vs Erika Curry / Melissa Coward0-6, 4-6
2023-05-27vs 3-KGreen-EnoLost 01
L#3 DoublesJudith Hagopian-Edwards / Angela Combs vs Kara Lardinois / Dongbo Lu2-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 Women Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Katie Elder
published
3.35
Jamie Moy
published 3.5
2.91
Beth Dingler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Beverly Fedewa
published 3
2.82
Mary T Long
published
2.81
Kari Lovetinsky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.69
Blake Ellis
published 3
2.68
Beth Angle
published 3
2.65
Hannah Gahagan
published 2.5
2.42
Jennifer Edmunds
published
2.30
Judith Hagopian-Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.17
Casie Bickers
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kari Lovetinsky + Beth Dingler123 matchesnot enough data
Mary T Long + Beth Dingler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Elder
65W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Jamie Moy
22W–23L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.35
3
Beth Dingler
115W–63L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Beverly Fedewa
19W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
2.88
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Kari Lovetinsky
116W–121L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Blake Ellis
12W–27L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Beth Angle
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68
2.5
Hannah Gahagan
18W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2023
0%12%88%
2.65
Jennifer Edmunds
14W–34L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.42
2.5
Judith Hagopian-Edwards
111W–207L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%94%6%
2.30
2.5
Casie Bickers
6W–15L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.