Teams

IND:Neverman

2024 NH Mixed 65 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-05vs MTS:Frawley:PodestaWon 20
W#1 DoublesMickey Neverman / Sue Kunkel vs Jane Frawley / Terry Gould6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Neverman / Mike Pagliuca vs Debi Seamans / Stephen Seamans6-2, 6-2
2024-08-22vs GB:PhillipsWon 20
W#1 DoublesBruce Leibig / Linda Leibig vs Fern Phillips / Pete Mason6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Neverman / Mickey Neverman vs Janice Williams / Russell Coward6-1, 6-0
2024-08-15vs MTS:Frawley:PodestaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulie Neverman / Mickey Neverman vs Richard King / Rebecca Helme6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Bondaruk / Jeanne Brown vs Linda Gould / Terry Gould6-1, 6-3
2024-08-01vs GB:PhillipsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulie Neverman / Mickey Neverman vs Nancy Braese / Michael Travers3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Leibig / Mike Pagliuca vs Janice Williams / William Raley4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-07-25vs MTS:Frawley:PodestaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMickey Neverman / Sue Kunkel vs Rebecca Helme / Richard King6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRobert Bondaruk / Linda Leibig vs Alice Podesta / Peter Podesta6-4, 6-1
2024-07-11vs GB:PhillipsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulie Neverman / Mickey Neverman vs Bernadette Randle / Luke Breton6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLinda Leibig / Mike Pagliuca vs Julie Malvone / William Raley4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IND:Neverman0684983
2GB:Phillips066613115
3MTS:Frawley:Podesta064818132

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bruce Leibig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Julie Neverman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.66
Robert Bondaruk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Sue Kunkel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Mickey Neverman
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.68
Jeanne Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Mike Pagliuca
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Linda Leibig
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mickey Neverman + Julie Neverman314 matchesnot enough data
Linda Leibig + Mike Pagliuca033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bruce Leibig
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Julie Neverman
58W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Robert Bondaruk
153W–96L career · 2 lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
Sue Kunkel
93W–90L career · 2 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.63
Mickey Neverman
16W–20L career · 6 lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
2.90
Jeanne Brown
33W–34L career · 1 line in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Mike Pagliuca
8W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
2.51
Linda Leibig
57W–123L career · 4 lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
2.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.