Teams

Em.Andino18S

2025 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-04vs Me.Dougher18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesEmily Andino vs Mccall Moore0-6, 0-6
2025-07-28vs Me.McCaskill18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesEmily Andino vs Holly Austin3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-14Lost 01
L#1 SinglesEmily Andino vs Barbara Williams5-7, 2-6
2025-07-09vs He.Suke18SLost 01
L#3 SinglesEmily Andino vs Heidi Suke3-6, 0-6
2025-06-30vs An.Acharya18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesEmily Andino vs Kristina Faulkner6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-09vs Su.Potter18SLost 03
L#1 SinglesSheri Peck vs Kelly Thompson2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSumathi Sundaram vs Jillian McDermott0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJenn Bollman vs Darrena Yehia5-7, 2-6
2025-06-02vs Ja.Stephan18SLost 12
L#1 SinglesSumathi Sundaram vs Jamie Stephan2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKatie McLean vs Caroline Bell-luehrs0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesLisa Pakela vs Rachael Van6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.12 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.40
Lisa Pakela
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.32
Emily Andino
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.26
Angier Miller
published 2.5
1.88
Jenn Bollman
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
1.74
Katie McLean
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Sheri Peck
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Sumathi Sundaram
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Pakela + Jenn Bollman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Pakela
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Emily Andino
36W–47L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.32
2.5
Angier Miller
5W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.26
Jenn Bollman
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.88
Katie McLean
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.74
Sheri Peck
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sumathi Sundaram
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.