Teams

OC Dana Hills - Jenny

2024 Adult 18 & Over - WEEKDAY WOMEN -OC · OC Women WD 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-05vs OC YLCC - Irene 11amWon 10
W#1 DoublesNina Berry / Lori McFerren vs Aimee Firouznam / Megan Osborn7-5, 6-0
2024-06-21vs SoCal/Jacobs/18&over4.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesSue Shin / Nina Berry vs Kelly Kehlet / Rena Banducci6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-06-14vs OC CMTC - SabrinaLost 01
L#1 DoublesNina Berry / Jenny Tetley vs Jennifer Czech / Maria Solomon6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-03vs OC Lifetime SC - MerwinLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristin Jones / Nina Berry vs Lynn Moore / Christine Reenders7-5, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Nina Berry
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.10
Lyndsay Boberg
published
3.93
Lori McFerren
published
3.74
Carrie Anderson
published 4
3.71
Kelly Dishno
published
3.63
Denise Banks
published 4
3.61
Jenny Tetley
published
3.60
Michelle Haghani
published
3.52
Christy Dozor
published 4
3.52
Amy Cramer
published 4
3.32
Sue Shin
published
3.23
Holly Ferber
published 3.5
3.18
Heather Bishoff
published 3.5
2.98
Carol Weinhardt
published 3.5
Michelle Espeleta
published
Tracy Brennan
published
Valerie Stam
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sue Shin + Denise Banks033 matchesnot enough data
Lori McFerren + Nina Berry213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nina Berry
112W–64L career · 4 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
4.15
Lyndsay Boberg
10W–2L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
4.10
Lori McFerren
24W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Carrie Anderson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.74
Kelly Dishno
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Denise Banks
7W–19L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.63
Jenny Tetley
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
Michelle Haghani
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Christy Dozor
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
44%55%<1%
3.52
4
Amy Cramer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Sue Shin
7W–25L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Holly Ferber
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Heather Bishoff
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Carol Weinhardt
0W–16L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.98
Michelle Espeleta
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tracy Brennan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Valerie Stam
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.