Teams

Rizor/Baker/Nashville

2026 Adult 55 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-24vs Pulley/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesLinda Rizor / Lyudmila Topchiy vs Karen Vasil / Amy Frankel Nau6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDonna Harrison / Candice Alexander vs Jeanne Ludington / Jeannie Tapley6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnita Clark / Sofie Carpenter vs Edith Nau / Patti Barrett Wright6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-04-17vs Hopkins/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Rizor / Lyudmila Topchiy vs Sherri Jones / Renee Atkins7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRenee Dunlap / Candice Alexander vs Larissa Rufener / Janet Yanez6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDonna Harrison / Joan Eatherly vs Linda Staffen / Janine Hopkins6-0, 6-4
2026-04-10vs Freeland/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesLinda Rizor / Candice Alexander vs Wendy Baker / Kim West6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRenee Dunlap / Donna Harrison vs Nancy King / Jennifer Freeland3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJo Mihalik / Michelle Brunson vs Angela Robbins / Jamie Vaughan1-6, 0-6
2026-04-03vs Pulley/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesRenee Dunlap / Candice Alexander vs Jenny Barnes / Brenda Mudter6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Sharp / Joan Eatherly vs Pamela Smith / Karen Vasil6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLinda Rizor / Anita Clark vs Jeanne Ludington / Jeannie Tapley5-7, 2-6
2026-03-27vs Hopkins/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Brunson / Lyudmila Topchiy vs Julie Comstock / Renee Atkins0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJoan Eatherly / Donna Sharp vs Sherri Jones / Janine Hopkins4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnita Clark / Donna Harrison vs Colleen Osburn / Kristan Schiedemeyer6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2026-03-20vs Freeland/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesCandice Alexander / Linda Rizor vs Nell Adams / Peggy Rosenblatt6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJo Mihalik / Sofie Carpenter vs Linda Ashford / Nancy King5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDana Baker / Renee Dunlap vs Jamie Vaughan / Laurie Farris6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Linda Rizor
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.03
Candice Alexander
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.82
Lyudmila Topchiy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Dana Baker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Renee Dunlap
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.71
Donna Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Joan Eatherly
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Anita Clark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Donna Sharp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jo Mihalik
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michelle Brunson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sofie Carpenter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Dunlap + Candice Alexander303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Rizor
10W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Candice Alexander
7W–2L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
Lyudmila Topchiy
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Dana Baker
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Renee Dunlap
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Donna Harrison
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Joan Eatherly
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Anita Clark
2W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
Donna Sharp
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jo Mihalik
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Brunson
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sofie Carpenter
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.