Teams

Lahaina Lobsters

2022 Adult 18 and Over League · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-23vs Wailea AcesLost 04
L#1 DoublesBarbara Skaggs / Ann Marugaki vs M Beverly Rivers / Michelle DeFilippi2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCeleste Abate vs Panna Cappelli3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Scherrer / Joyce O'Hanlon vs Amanda Tillson / Kelly Thayer2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTania Kellermeyer vs Rowena Nikki Baysa2-6, 0-6
2022-07-03vs Wailea AcesLost 23
W#1 DoublesMonica Bice / Tania Kellermeyer vs Michelle DeFilippi / Kelly Thayer6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesCeleste Abate vs Stacie Thorlakson4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarole Anderson / Barbara Skaggs vs Barbara Botkin / Amanda Tillson4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKim Houlne vs Crystal Graves0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Cross / Ann Marugaki vs Tara Pepper / Gaela Prince1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-06-18vs Maui MagicLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnn Marugaki / Barbara Skaggs vs Susan Miller / Donna Revells2-6, 3-6
2022-06-11vs Wailea AcesLost 03
L#1 DoublesTania Kellermeyer / Alice Koniges vs Catherine Hall / Stacie Thorlakson4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCeleste Abate vs Crystal Graves0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Skaggs / Joyce O'Hanlon vs Lore Lee Robello / Panna Cappelli1-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Ann Marugaki
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Tania Kellermeyer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.12
Celeste Abate
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Barbara Skaggs
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Alice Koniges
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
Kim Houlne
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Carole Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joyce O'Hanlon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Monica Bice
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Cross
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Renee Scherrer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Bailey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tania Kellermeyer + Ann Marugaki4155% games+7.5% vs expected
Nancy Cross + Ann Marugaki4253% games+2.4% vs expected
Nancy Cross + Barbara Skaggs17853% games+0.9% vs expected
Barbara Skaggs + Ann Marugaki121153% games−0.2% vs expected
Barbara Skaggs + Monica Bice5454% games−3.7% vs expected
Barbara Skaggs + Tania Kellermeyer3350% games−5.1% vs expected
Tania Kellermeyer + Renee Scherrer044 matchesnot enough data
Tania Kellermeyer + Celeste Abate224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Marugaki
75W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Tania Kellermeyer
42W–63L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Celeste Abate
22W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Barbara Skaggs
48W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Alice Koniges
14W–63L career · 2 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.03
Kim Houlne
34W–24L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%67%33%
2.94
Carole Anderson
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Joyce O'Hanlon
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Monica Bice
30W–13L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Cross
29W–32L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Renee Scherrer
4W–16L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Susan Bailey
18W–29L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.