Teams

HBSQ-Washed Up-McDowell

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.43 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-22vs BC-ChenWon 20
W#1 DoublesIan David / Peter Reni vs Alex Chen / Daniel Halos6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRobert Mann / Jack Bong vs David Feller / Jeffrey Stoner2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-14vs CAC/SL-SharmaSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJack Bong / Peter Reni vs Anthony Tran / Chad Masche2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesIan David vs James Hua1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDarko Stankovic / Brad McGinnis vs Will Blanchard / Martin Uylangco1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJoshua Wah-Blumberg / Robert Mann vs Rick Anderson / Everet Wang6-3, 6-2
2022-05-07vs BTA-The BTA Boyz-LeeWon 40
W#1 DoublesSteven Lin / Brad McGinnis vs Nikolas Falke / Ben Kolpa6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesMark Weil vs Nicholas Aguirre4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDarko Stankovic / Ian David vs Antoine Haas / Michael Lee6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRobert Mann / Jack Bong vs Jacob Lee / Nathanial Wieland6-2, 7-5
2022-05-01vs MC-4.5 PurgananLost 13
L#1 DoublesPeter Reni / Steven Lin vs Hoona Jo / Keenan Dolan2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJack Bong vs Akshay Kalyan2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCameron McDowell / Robert Mann vs Ham Kang / Nick Fulcher6-1, 7-5
L#2 SinglesMichael Tieu vs Stephen Yu1-6, 1-6
2022-04-23vs AYTC-Del RosarioLost 04
L#1 DoublesJack Bong / Peter Reni vs Branden Muraki / Connor Vordale7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHunter Nelson vs Timothy Carlson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Mann / Joshua Wah-Blumberg vs Albert Lu / Winston McClanahan3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMichael Tieu vs Jackson Cook1-6, 0-6
2022-04-16vs TCSP-BAMF-HartvigsonLost 14
L#1 DoublesCameron McDowell / Robert Mann vs Mark Ball / Nick Ketcham3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesBrad McGinnis vs Hiromichi Yamamoto1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDarko Stankovic / Ian David vs Chris Casazza / Maros Blaha3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesHunter Nelson vs Morgan Ball6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMark Weil / Joshua Wah-Blumberg vs Robert Sheppard / Stephen Rosen1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-04-09vs PSC-Smashers-TortopWon 31
W#1 DoublesDarko Stankovic / Brad McGinnis vs Temoojin Chalasani / Silas Setterstrom6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJack Bong vs Ruslan Kasymov6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCameron McDowell / Robert Mann vs Denis Tortop / Adrian Cosma6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAndrew Pei / Mark Weil vs Tim Mcroberts / Justin Madison1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-01vs MC-4.5 PurgananLost 23
L#1 DoublesPeter Reni / Ian David vs Jim Vana / Florian Purganan1-6
L#1 SinglesHunter Nelson vs Akshay Kalyan3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCameron McDowell / Robert Mann vs John Tillman / Ham Kang4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBrad McGinnis vs Nomar Mapalo6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDarko Stankovic / Andrew Pei vs Thadeus Cacanindin / Lynn Maung3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Cameron McDowell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.30
Darko Stankovic
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Brad McGinnis
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
Hunter Nelson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.15
Jack Bong
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.65
Robert Mann
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.60
Andrew Pei
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Ian David
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Joshua Wah-Blumberg
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Weil
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Michael Tieu
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Peter Reni
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cameron McDowell + Robert Mann3253% games+7.7% vs expected
Joshua Wah-Blumberg + Robert Mann6453% games+4.5% vs expected
Cameron McDowell + Peter Reni3259% games+1.9% vs expected
Brad McGinnis + Darko Stankovic3254% gamesnot enough data
Darko Stankovic + Robert Mann404 matchesnot enough data
Cameron McDowell + Jack Bong213 matchesnot enough data
Darko Stankovic + Jack Bong213 matchesnot enough data
Jack Bong + Robert Mann303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cameron McDowell
73W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Darko Stankovic
20W–13L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Brad McGinnis
8W–8L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Hunter Nelson
17W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Jack Bong
28W–33L career · 6 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Robert Mann
87W–43L career · 8 lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.65
4
Andrew Pei
22W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Ian David
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joshua Wah-Blumberg
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Weil
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Tieu
2W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Reni
8W–8L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.