Teams

6-MLong-ENO

2024 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 4.0 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-08vs 4-JHoward-ENOWon 10
W#2 SinglesChrista McGill vs Carrie Couto6-3, 6-1
2024-11-13vs 5-TLangino-SVCLost 01
L#3 SinglesCelina Morice vs Christine Sudzina Schut5-7, 2-6
2024-11-06vs 2-BShane-ENOLost 01
L#3 SinglesCelina Morice vs Liz Chen2-6, 0-6
2024-10-30vs 3-JRoss-ENOLost 02
L#1 SinglesDayna Kelly vs Carrie Guthrie4-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesCelina Morice vs Hannah Silverstein3-6, 5-7
2024-10-23Lost 01
L#1 SinglesChrista McGill vs Kelsey Kearney3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2024-10-16vs 1-CYu-ENOWon 20
W#1 SinglesDayna Kelly vs Kelsey Kowalski6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesChrista McGill vs Anita Yang2-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 4.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Dayna Kelly
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.74
Kim Peters
published
3.68
Elizabeth Chan
published
3.58
Christa McGill
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.39
Celina Morice
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Sara Loeblein
published
2.78
Mary T Long
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dayna Kelly + Christa McGill8358% games+3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dayna Kelly
126W–99L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.93
Kim Peters
20W–20L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Elizabeth Chan
34W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%10%90%
3.68
4
Christa McGill
119W–123L career · 3 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.58
3.5
Celina Morice
92W–77L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
3.39
Sara Loeblein
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.