Teams

Fowle

2023 Frederick Adult 18 & Over · Frederick Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.38 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-19vs CadyLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Weaver / Joseph D'Agrosa vs Michael Mahaney / Byron Levy3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Maleson / Hao Du vs John Shin / Steve French7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2023-06-18vs CadyWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteve Maleson / Jeffrey Fowle vs Gregory Selby / Michael Mahaney6-4, 7-6
2023-06-15vs CadyWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteve Maleson / Jeff Manwiller vs Gregory Selby / Luis Lozano3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-11vs CadySplit 11
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Fowle / Paul Levine vs Wornden Ly / John Shin6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSteve Maleson / Shawn Peffall vs Stephen Dessel / Gregory Selby1-6, 1-6
2023-05-31vs CadySplit 11
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Fowle / Paul Levine vs Luis Lozano / Daniel Park3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPeter Bonbrest / Joseph D'Agrosa vs Justin Cady / James Smoot3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-22vs CadyLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoseph D'Agrosa / Paul Levine vs Steve French / Stephen Dessel7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-05-18vs CadyLost 01
L#1 DoublesPeter Bonbrest / Jeffrey Fowle vs John Shin / Steve French2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-15vs CadyLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeff Manwiller / Paul Levine vs Doug DeLawter / Steve French6-2, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Steve Maleson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.12
Jeffrey Fowle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Jeff Manwiller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.99
Paul Levine
published
3.76
Robert Weaver
published
Joseph D'Agrosa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Hao Du
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Maleson + Jeffrey Fowle10556% games+0.8% vs expected
Steve Maleson + Jeff Manwiller213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Steve Maleson
176W–104L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Jeffrey Fowle
182W–104L career · 4 lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Jeff Manwiller
35W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
4.04
Paul Levine
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.99
Robert Weaver
19W–22L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Joseph D'Agrosa
46W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Hao Du
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.