Teams

Plexico

2025 Loudoun Adult 18 & Over Women · Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.05 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-12vs Coleman - Tequila MockingbirdsLost 13
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Greis / Vanessa Ogilvie vs Annie Richardson / Moira Smith0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Solander vs Shruti Srinivasan2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAshley Plexico / Wendy Hopkins vs Nancy Sicairos / Colleen Stoltz0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJeanne Baily / Jennifer Beets vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-05vs Coleman - Tequila MockingbirdsLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatalina Tafur / Carolyn Greis vs Jennifer Eveges / Jessica Coleman4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCandice Rininger vs Shruti Srinivasan2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Solander / June Wheatley vs Maddie Tran / Lexie Linderman4-6, 4-6
2025-05-29vs Coleman - Tequila MockingbirdsLost 02
L#1 DoublesCatalina Tafur / Vanessa Ogilvie vs Christine Becer / Lily Riedel1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJeanne Baily / Carolyn Greis vs Colleen Stoltz / Nancy Sicairos7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-05-13vs Coleman - Tequila MockingbirdsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Beets / Ashley Plexico vs Christine Becer / Moira Smith4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Greis / Jeanne Baily vs Maddie Tran / Colleen Stoltz5-7, 3-6
2025-04-29vs Coleman - Tequila MockingbirdsLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatalina Tafur / Margaret Sita vs Heather Viar / Jennifer Eveges1-6, 5-7
2025-04-22vs Coleman - Tequila MockingbirdsLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Greis / Catalina Tafur vs Lori Reed / Heather Viar1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCandice Rininger / Margaret Sita vs Emma Shine / Grete Bravo1-6, 0-6
2025-04-15vs Coleman - Tequila MockingbirdsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Beets / Elizabeth Solander vs Jennifer Eveges / Lily Riedel2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJeanne Baily / Carolyn Greis vs Annie Richardson / Erin Green1-6, 0-6
2025-04-10vs Coleman - Tequila MockingbirdsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Greis / Catalina Tafur vs Erin Green / Grete Bravo7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJutta Nohra / June Wheatley vs Nancy Sicairos / Moo Hackett1-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Jennifer Beets
published
4.01
Beth Kaufman
published 4
3.93
Catalina Tafur
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Elizabeth Solander
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.92
June Wheatley
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.88
Candice Rininger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.87
Erin Kaplan
published
3.83
Margaret Sita
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
Ashley Plexico
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.79
Carolyn Greis
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 4
3.74
Caitlin Levanson
published 4
3.66
Jeanne Baily
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jutta Nohra
published
Kerrie Jenkins
published
Vanessa Ogilvie
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanne Baily + Carolyn Greis171152% games+5.2% vs expected
Erin Kaplan + Beth Kaufman20365% games+4.4% vs expected
June Wheatley + Elizabeth Solander181155% games+0.7% vs expected
Ashley Plexico + Elizabeth Solander1434% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Plexico + Candice Rininger224 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Greis + Catalina Tafur123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Beets
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
4.04
4
Beth Kaufman
42W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.01
4.5
Catalina Tafur
114W–169L career · 5 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.93
4
Elizabeth Solander
226W–123L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
June Wheatley
122W–91L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
3.92
4
Candice Rininger
106W–90L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.88
Erin Kaplan
40W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Margaret Sita
100W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Ashley Plexico
235W–58L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Carolyn Greis
583W–372L career · 13 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Caitlin Levanson
20W–14L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Jeanne Baily
338W–236L career · 9 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Jutta Nohra
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kerrie Jenkins
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vanessa Ogilvie
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.