Teams

MCAC:Smashers:Medeiros

2021 Cape Adult 55 & Over Women · 8.0 55 & Over Women SUMMER

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-25vs MCAC:Cicadas:Hoagland/HarbilasLost 12
L#1 DoublesSharon Edwards / Coleen Robbie vs Alison Harbilas / Minda Gay5-7, 3-4
W#2 DoublesBess Brodsky / Catherine Haynes vs Marjorie White / Pamela Peek6-7, 2-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoyce Taber / Kim Sullivan vs Lisa Swansey / Christine Steiner4-6, 3-6
2021-06-18vs MCAC:Cicadas:Hoagland/HarbilasWon 21
W#1 DoublesSharon Edwards / Coleen Robbie vs Joanne Obryan / Sherry Crockett6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCatherine Haynes / Bess Brodsky vs Alison Harbilas / Lisa Swansey3-6, 5-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKim Sullivan / Catherine Cetta vs Nancy Whitehurst / Pamela Peek2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-06-11vs MCAC:Cicadas:Hoagland/HarbilasWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Rice / Karin Menegay vs Minda Gay / Sherry Crockett6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKarin Mazzoni / Nancy Boughton vs Baysie Wightman / Denise Wright6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoyce Taber / Catherine Cetta vs Lisa Swansey / Marjorie White3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-04vs MCAC:Cicadas:Hoagland/HarbilasWon 20
W#2 DoublesAmy Rice / Karin Menegay vs Joanne Mahoney / Pamela Peek6-1, 6-5
W#3 DoublesGail Jacobson / Coleen Robbie vs Merry Abbott / Nancy Whitehurst4-6, 5-4, 1-0
2021-05-21vs MCAC:Cicadas:Hoagland/HarbilasLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaureen Foster / Rhonda Snow vs Minda Gay / Sherry Crockett6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKarin Mazzoni / Nancy Boughton vs Baysie Wightman / Joanne Mahoney6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBess Brodsky / Tia Lilly vs Lisa Swansey / Marjorie White4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-05-14vs MCAC:Cicadas:Hoagland/HarbilasWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Rice / Karin Menegay vs Sherry Crockett / Joanne Obryan7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGail Jacobson / Rhonda Snow vs Lisa Swansey / Christine Steiner6-1, 6-4
2021-05-07vs MCAC:Cicadas:Hoagland/HarbilasWon 20
W#2 DoublesAmy Rice / Karin Menegay vs Merry Abbott / Joanne Obryan6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTia Lilly / Gail Jacobson vs Baysie Wightman / Robin Perry6-3, 3-0
2021-04-30vs MCAC:Cicadas:Hoagland/HarbilasWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Rice / Maureen Foster vs Alison Harbilas / Sherry Crockett7-6, 5-0
L#2 DoublesRhonda Snow / Tia Lilly vs Joanne Mahoney / Minda Gay3-6, 5-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKarin Mazzoni / Nancy Boughton vs Merry Abbott / Lisa Swansey6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 55 & Over Women SUMMER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCAC:Smashers:Medeiros6218616167
2MCAC:Cicadas:Hoagland/Harbilas2661840256

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Rice
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Coleen Robbie
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Karin Mazzoni
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Bess Brodsky
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Joyce Taber
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
2.78
Catherine Haynes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gail Jacobson
published
Karin Menegay
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kim Sullivan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rhonda Snow
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Tia Lilly
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tia Lilly + Karin Mazzoni10260% games+0.3% vs expected
Amy Rice + Karin Menegay11069% gamesnot enough data
Joyce Taber + Kim Sullivan2355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Rice
22W–5L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Coleen Robbie
17W–12L career · type S · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Karin Mazzoni
78W–34L career · 3 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Bess Brodsky
14W–4L career · type M · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Joyce Taber
144W–136L career · 11 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Catherine Haynes
22W–10L career · type M · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.78
Gail Jacobson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Karin Menegay
39W–10L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kim Sullivan
22W–16L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rhonda Snow
39W–23L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tia Lilly
51W–35L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.