Teams

1.September

2023 NO LEAGUE · ADMIN USE ONLY

27 players · average NTRP 3.66 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for ADMIN USE ONLY have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Eboni Lance
published 4.5
4.20
Arash Hanif
published 4.5
3.92
Harris Rosenblatt
published
3.86
Akash Agrawal
published 4
3.79
J Nathan
published 4
3.78
Katie Tetrault
published 4
3.77
3.72
3.68
Landis Milam
published
3.62
Tricia Muneses
published
3.55
Deborah Greenside
published 3.5
3.54
Laura McInerney
published
3.52
Jodi Murray
published
3.39
Olugbenga Okubadejo
published 3.5
3.31
Eric Wachter
published 3.5
Chloe Zhang
published 3.5
3.21
Andrea Burkert
published 3.5
3.12
Mervin Dennis
published
3.05
Kathleen Maiden
published 3
2.97
Tracie Hill
published
Barbara Braffett
published 3
2.70
Terri Windsor
published 3
2.65
Diane Ruggiero
published 3
2.52
Lemin Xiao
published
Matt Galosky
published
Murty Challa
published
Todd Campbell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Demetrius Crawford + J Nathan224 matchesnot enough data
Eboni Lance + Christine Ioannou303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eboni Lance
355W–213L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%20%
4.38
4.5
Arash Hanif
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.20
Harris Rosenblatt
17W–14L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.92
4
Akash Agrawal
21W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
4
J Nathan
124W–108L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Katie Tetrault
144W–97L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Christine Ioannou
152W–115L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Demetrius Crawford
204W–161L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Landis Milam
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Tricia Muneses
43W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Deborah Greenside
139W–167L career · no lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.55
Laura McInerney
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
Jodi Murray
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Olugbenga Okubadejo
256W–209L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Eric Wachter
52W–59L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Chloe Zhang
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Andrea Burkert
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Mervin Dennis
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Kathleen Maiden
106W–187L career · no lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.05
Tracie Hill
43W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.97
3
Barbara Braffett
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Terri Windsor
140W–125L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Diane Ruggiero
85W–179L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
2.65
Lemin Xiao
16W–28L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
2.52
Matt Galosky
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Murty Challa
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Todd Campbell
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.