Teams

IND-Hustle, hit and never quit-Leeton Misleh

2021 Coed 18-39 · 3.5 Coed

7 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-04-16vs IND-JohnsonWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesTheresa Chau vs Annie Johnson6-2
2021-04-09vs MC-Cats-LeeLost 02
L#1 Female SinglesElizaveta Hermann vs Abhinaya Raghothaman3-5
L#1 Male DoublesKiyon Ross / Yutaro Maki vs Abraham Lee / Teppei Karasawa0-6
2021-04-09vs IND-Yeet Fleet-VichWon 10
W#1 Mixed DoublesLakhmeet Singh Ghai / Emily Misleh vs Alan Pugh / Summer Than5-4
2021-04-03vs WSC-Float like a Butterfly! HawkinsSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesAmy Hsu / Elizaveta Hermann vs Emily Hawkins / Carly Holtgraves4-6
W#1 Male SinglesYutaro Maki vs Will Zhao6-3
2021-04-03vs BTA-Party Tennis-CasimoWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesEmily Misleh vs Kaitlyn Casimo6-1
2021-04-02Won 10
W#1 Female SinglesEmily Misleh vs Kendra Maeser6-2
2021-03-26vs IND-JohnsonWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesElizaveta Hermann vs Annie Johnson5-4
2021-03-19vs IND-Yeet Fleet-VichWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesEmily Misleh / Krista Philbrick vs Summer Than / Karla Franco6-1
W#1 Female DoublesTheresa Chau / Amy Hsu vs Lindsey Holtgraves / Carly Holtgraves6-2
2021-03-05vs MC-Cats-LeeLost 03
L#1 Female DoublesElizaveta Hermann / Theresa Chau vs Ashley Jay / Abhinaya Raghothaman3-5
L#1 Female SinglesElizaveta Hermann vs Abhinaya Raghothaman1-6
L#1 Male SinglesYutaro Maki vs Andrew Lee3-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 Coed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MC-Cats-Lee06342294
2ETC-Pham 3.506261010125
3AYTC-Simply Smashing-Leeton Misleh06241212121
4IND-Hustle, hit and never quit-Leeton Misleh06191714136
5IND-Yeet Fleet-Vich06132319160
6WSC-Float like a Butterfly! Hawkins06142220173
7BTA-Party Tennis-Casimo0692726183
8IND-Johnson0653130186

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Jonathan Ip
published
3.75
Emily Misleh
usually #1 Female Doubles 43%, also #1 Female Singles 43% · published 4
3.71
Yutaro Maki
usually #1 Male Singles 67%, also #1 Male Doubles 33% · published 4
3.21
Theresa Chau
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Elizaveta Hermann
usually #1 Female Singles 75%, also #1 Female Doubles 25% · published 3
Kiyon Ross
published
Ryan Leeton
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Ip
34W–43L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
4.11
4
Emily Misleh
98W–44L career · 7 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Yutaro Maki
92W–33L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Theresa Chau
24W–29L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
3
Elizaveta Hermann
41W–58L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
2.87
Kiyon Ross
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Ryan Leeton
9W–19L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.