Teams

ACAC- Davis Double Trouble

2024 Richmond Mixed 40 & Over · Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-08vs Avalon MizrachWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarbara Kasten / Scott Oakley vs Sarah Croft-Whelan / Jeremy Kokemor6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-06-26vs ACAC Naylor/JonesLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Johnson / Elizabeth Coleman vs Jeanette Kim / Irvin Banks1-6, 1-6
2024-06-14vs Avalon Mier/BlandWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristina Aeinan Kang / John Mulligan vs Laurie Huizenga / Richard Bland6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2024-06-10vs Avalon GhitaWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Coleman / Jeffrey Johnson vs Vikram Nagulan / Jeannie Wyant6-3, 7-6
2024-06-07vs MTC Miracles - MarksLost 02
L#1 DoublesBarbara Kasten / Tim Kasten vs Christopher Stidham / Amanda Mayhew6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristina Aeinan Kang / John Mulligan vs Kenneth Madrigal / Lindsay Hardage3-6, 2-6
2024-05-31vs Bon Air MillerWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Coleman / Jeffrey Johnson vs Kim Boys / Martha Rhodes6-3, 6-2
2024-05-22vs MAC CousinsWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristina Aeinan Kang / John Mulligan vs Jay Munya / Lisa Yost6-4, 6-2
2024-05-13vs TDC CarlyleWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarbara Kasten / Tim Kasten vs Sheri Carlyle / Patrick Jernigan7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Grace Kim
published 4
3.65
Christina Aeinan Kang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Eddie Kim
published 3.5
3.60
Doug Okay
published 4
3.36
John Mulligan
published
3.32
Tim Kasten
published
3.30
Jonathan Meade
published
3.28
Jeffrey Johnson
published
3.25
Barbara Kasten
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Thomas Wilson
published
3.23
Rebecca Cassilly
published
3.21
Elizabeth Coleman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Jean Davis
published
3.16
Deanne Ralston
published 3.5
3.11
Carol Pfeiffer
published 3.5
3.00
Joanne Wilson
published
2.94
Eric Carter
published 3.5
Matt Pepple
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Meade + Deanne Ralston123 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Wilson + Carol Pfeiffer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Grace Kim
24W–26L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Christina Aeinan Kang
157W–167L career · 8 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Eddie Kim
30W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.63
4
Doug Okay
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.60
John Mulligan
23W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.36
Tim Kasten
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
Jonathan Meade
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Jeffrey Johnson
23W–24L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Barbara Kasten
158W–66L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Thomas Wilson
24W–19L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
Rebecca Cassilly
18W–15L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Elizabeth Coleman
172W–119L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
Jean Davis
24W–23L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Deanne Ralston
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Carol Pfeiffer
9W–16L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
Joanne Wilson
15W–16L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
3.5
Eric Carter
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.94
Matt Pepple
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.