Teams

Match Point 70+

2023 Legends League (Spring) · 7.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-22vs Geezers 70Won 10
W#1 DoublesLyle Smith / Arthur Wong vs Roger Kondo / Andres Libed3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-03-15vs Geezers 70Won 10
W#3 DoublesArthur Wong / Steve Wendel vs Roy Araki / Danny Lum6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2023-03-08vs Geezers 70Lost 01
L#2 DoublesVincent Akamine / Gil Bueno vs Roy Araki / Andres Libed6-7, 3-6
2023-03-01vs Geezers 70Won 10
W#2 DoublesGil Bueno / Jeffrey Wong vs Danny Lum / Cedric Yamamoto7-6, 7-5
2023-02-22vs Geezers 70Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGil Bueno / Jeffrey Wong vs Francis Achiu / Michael Heafner0-6, 2-6
2023-02-15vs Geezers 70Won 10
W#2 DoublesGil Bueno / Jeffrey Wong vs Roy Araki / Danny Lum6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 7.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Match Point 70+249922171

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Arthur Wong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Gil Bueno
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Jeffrey Wong
published
2.82
Steve Wendel
published
Harry Wong
published 3
Leighton Fong
published
Lyle Smith
published
Vincent Akamine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gil Bueno + Jeffrey Wong1635% gamesnot enough data
Vincent Akamine + Gil Bueno134 matchesnot enough data
Lyle Smith + Jeffrey Wong314 matchesnot enough data
Arthur Wong + Harry Wong033 matchesnot enough data
Harry Wong + Jeffrey Wong123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Arthur Wong
23W–23L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Gil Bueno
73W–82L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Jeffrey Wong
34W–55L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
Steve Wendel
21W–44L career · no lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
2.82
3
Harry Wong
9W–21L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leighton Fong
2W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lyle Smith
20W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vincent Akamine
6W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.