Teams

INT:You're Only Served Twice:Weber

2025 SCT Adult 18 & Over Men · 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-28vs KH:Double Deuce:Cassidy/NelsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesKarl Mergenthaler / John Passios vs Pete Cassidy / Timothy Bepler3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLuciano Raus vs Ivo Nenin5-7, 5-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Lawrence / James Foster vs Jeffrey Nelson / Greg Mccall1-6, 0-6
2025-06-08vs KH:Double Deuce:Cassidy/NelsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Davitt / Jordan Young vs Prateek Gahoi / Geoffrey Sweitzer0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesLuciano Raus vs Ivo Nenin4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKarl Mergenthaler / Jason Temerowski vs Jeffrey Nelson / Joseph Blazovic6-1, 6-2
2025-05-04vs KH:Double Deuce:Cassidy/NelsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesJason Temerowski / Karl Mergenthaler vs Pete Cassidy / Jason Perez6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLuciano Raus vs Ivo Nenin4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Davitt / Jordan Young vs Jeffrey Nelson / Prateek Gahoi3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Jason Temerowski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Karl Mergenthaler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Jordan Young
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Luciano Raus
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.98
Erik Schneberger
published
2.91
John Passios
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
John Davitt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Jeffrey Darien
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
James Foster
published
Robert Lawrence
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karl Mergenthaler + Jason Temerowski7454% games+1.1% vs expected
John Davitt + Jordan Young1434% games−15.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Temerowski
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Karl Mergenthaler
11W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Jordan Young
5W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Luciano Raus
2W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
3.06
Erik Schneberger
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
John Passios
7W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.91
John Davitt
3W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.84
Jeffrey Darien
27W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
James Foster
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Lawrence
0W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.