Teams

MBarthalmus

2022 Capital Summer 55 & Over Singles League · 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-18vs DLanierLost 02
L#1 SinglesGillian Kelleher vs Deb Lanier4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 SinglesAna Maria Allessi vs Takako Schenberger1-6, 2-6
2022-07-12Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMarina Barthalmus vs Martha Zurawel4-6, 3-6
2022-07-11vs DLanierWon 10
W#1 SinglesGillian Kelleher vs Carolina Robayo7-5, 6-3
2022-06-20vs DLanierLost 01
L#2 SinglesAna Maria Allessi vs Laurie Reiss5-7, 1-6
2022-06-14vs DLanierLost 01
L#1 SinglesGillian Kelleher vs Carolina Robayo4-6, 2-6
2022-06-13vs DLanierLost 12
L#1 SinglesMarina Barthalmus vs Takako Schenberger3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesGillian Kelleher vs Laurie Reiss6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesAna Maria Allessi vs Cecilia Edgar4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Marina Barthalmus
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
3.19
Jocelyn Badulis
published
3.16
Gillian Kelleher
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.70
Ana Maria Allessi
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marina Barthalmus + Gillian Kelleher12753% games+10.7% vs expected
Ana Maria Allessi + Marina Barthalmus3645% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Marina Barthalmus
218W–213L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall
18W–17L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Jocelyn Badulis
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Gillian Kelleher
166W–164L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3
Ana Maria Allessi
80W–86L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.