Teams

10 Woodlake Phelps

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-03vs 22 Willow Oaks KramerLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Giangregorio / Irene Shepherd vs Jenny Norfleet / Catherine Matawaran7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2023-05-20vs 13 Burkwood Delaney-DixonWon 20
W#1 DoublesIrene Shepherd / Taryn Giroux vs Kimberly Bryant / Jennifer Hazelgrove4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJeanean Phelps vs Susan Pennino6-3, 7-5
2023-05-13vs 15 LPC EarleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesIrene Shepherd / Meaco Coffey vs Carolyn Elgin / Kim Earle6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJeanean Phelps vs Christie Wisotzki6-7, 1-6
2023-05-06vs 9 Salisbury JamLost 02
L#1 SinglesIrene Shepherd vs Karin Speizer1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJeanean Phelps vs Carla Shaffer4-6, 1-6
2023-05-04vs 3 RCC WozniakWon 20
W#1 DoublesTaryn Giroux / Jeanean Phelps vs Beverly Davis / Lexi Doyle6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesIrene Shepherd vs Heather Breed6-3, 6-0
2023-04-29vs 18 Belmont Bouncers BatesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeanean Phelps / Irene Shepherd vs Linda Benson / Jane Harrison7-5, 6-3
2023-04-19vs 20 Westwood Wetzel/KirkebySplit 11
W#2 DoublesJeanean Phelps / Taryn Giroux vs Lexie Allen / Erin Gardner6-4, 7-5
L#2 SinglesIrene Shepherd vs Kate Hamilton2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Irene Shepherd
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
2.90
Jeanean Phelps
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.88
Adelaide Urban
published 3
2.86
Lisa Giangregorio
published
2.79
Judy D'Amico
published
2.79
2.77
Julia Morrison
published
2.73
Rosie Ortiz
published
2.72
Taryn Giroux
published
2.60
Laura Brawley
published
2.22
Diane Renkin
published 2.5
Meaco Coffey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanean Phelps + Irene Shepherd10558% games+8.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Irene Shepherd
111W–81L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
Jeanean Phelps
145W–152L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Adelaide Urban
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.88
Lisa Giangregorio
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
2.86
Judy D'Amico
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
2.79
Rebecca Schneeberger
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
2.79
Julia Morrison
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
Rosie Ortiz
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Taryn Giroux
16W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.72
Laura Brawley
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.60
2.5
Diane Renkin
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.22
Meaco Coffey
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.