Teams

V-LLW NRCC Nice Aces-O'Keeffe

2024 SoCal Doubles 18&Over -- WEEKDAY WOMEN · Ventura - Women 3.0 WD

9 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-19vs Spanish HillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesLeilani O'Keeffe / Ghazaleh Soltani vs Tracy Mancuso / Wissal Buscemi6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-18vs Sherwood StarletsWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeilani O'Keeffe / Ghazaleh Soltani vs Hollis Lanson / Cindy Iser3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-10-29vs Sunset Slam SquadWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeilani O'Keeffe / Ghazaleh Soltani vs Nora Valentino / Heather Kawai6-4, 6-1
2024-10-21vs Pierpont RacquettesWon 20
W#1 DoublesGhazaleh Soltani / Michelle Rapoport vs Maria Finney / Susan Bender6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLeilani O'Keeffe / Sara Lakatos vs Lucia Shanahan / Charne Huff6-2, 6-4
2024-10-15vs Double the FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesGhazaleh Soltani / Leilani O'Keeffe vs Van Stephenson / Teresa Amescua-Smith6-2, 6-3
2024-09-23vs Las Posas Shot GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeilani O'Keeffe / Ghazaleh Soltani vs Krista Howard / Lisa ONeil1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Michelle Rapoport
published
3.53
Ghazaleh Soltani
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Bodee Lee
published 3.5
3.24
Chelsea Goldenberg
published 3.5
3.15
WHITNEY Potter
published 3
3.04
Erin Brubach
published
2.97
Meredith Romero
published
2.88
Leilani O'Keeffe
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
LAURA BROWN
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leilani O'Keeffe + WHITNEY Potter9358% games+11.3% vs expected
Michelle Rapoport + Ghazaleh Soltani5165% games+8.5% vs expected
Leilani O'Keeffe + Ghazaleh Soltani15559% gamesnot enough data
Bodee Lee + Chelsea Goldenberg224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Rapoport
13W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.63
3.5
Ghazaleh Soltani
100W–54L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Bodee Lee
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Chelsea Goldenberg
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.24
3
WHITNEY Potter
23W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.15
Erin Brubach
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Meredith Romero
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Leilani O'Keeffe
90W–61L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
LAURA BROWN
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.