Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW3.5C-DT

2023 ADULT 18&Over Daytime · Women 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2023-04-13vs CLAREMONT R and S 18AW3.5A-DTLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Dommes / Kari Trimble vs Michelle McGuinness / Kathleen Morris4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Tuesdai Powers
published
3.57
Kelly Sanchez
published
3.50
Tracey Hull
published
3.45
Ronit Jorgensen
published
3.38
Shashanna Singh
published
3.37
Laura Dommes
published
3.30
Ramya Jayaraman
published
3.23
Emily Amott
published
3.20
Jill Freeman
published
3.17
Yulia Costello
published
3.15
Kari Trimble
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Michelle Weiss
published
3.08
Mendy Gonzales
published
3.05
Karina Newsom
published
3.00
Mickie Kerr
published
2.97
Diana Rosdahl
published 3
2.85
Traci Rebiejo
published
2.52
Elaine Marshall
published
Paige Fields
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Weiss + Kari Trimble5158% games+4.5% vs expected
Shashanna Singh + Tracey Hull1634% games−8.1% vs expected
Michelle Weiss + Tuesdai Powers213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tuesdai Powers
24W–30L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
Kelly Sanchez
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.57
Tracey Hull
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
Ronit Jorgensen
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.45
Shashanna Singh
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
3.38
Laura Dommes
11W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
Ramya Jayaraman
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
Emily Amott
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Jill Freeman
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Yulia Costello
11W–29L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
Kari Trimble
44W–63L career · 1 line in 2023
13%86%1%
3.15
Michelle Weiss
14W–13L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Mendy Gonzales
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.08
Karina Newsom
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.05
Mickie Kerr
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Diana Rosdahl
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.97
Traci Rebiejo
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
Elaine Marshall
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
2.52
Paige Fields
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.