Teams

Gary (Ron Ehmann)

2024 MIAMIDADE Combo 18 & Over - Night · 7.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-21vs Miami/Gayle/18&over7.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesMariana Salvioli / ELIANA BIGAI vs Natalia Frantsevskaya / Yoandra Perez6-3, 6-4
2024-08-14vs TeamFormanWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmanda Noboa / Rajni Agarwal vs Amy Morrow / Monica Pardo6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDana Hamrick / Cristina Melendez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-07vs TeamFormanWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmanda Noboa / Debby Lichtner vs Mira Hashe / Jayne Irvin Hopps7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMariana Salvioli / ELIANA BIGAI vs Yuliet Pellegrini / Amy Morrow7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-24vs deDios (Crandon Park)Won 20
W#1 DoublesAmanda Noboa / Rajni Agarwal vs Cynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero / Margarita Nunez6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDana Hamrick / Kristi Atkison vs Gema de Dios / Ana Pastorino4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-07-10vs TeamForman2Won 20
W#1 DoublesCristina Melendez / Dana Hamrick vs Mellissa Cili / Elsa Gonzalez5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesELIANA BIGAI / Rajni Agarwal vs Andrea Mientkiewicz / Leticia Diaz3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-26vs Miami/Gayle/18&over7.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmanda Noboa / ELIANA BIGAI vs Rossana OKAMURA / Yoandra Perez6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMariana Salvioli / Maria Debacher vs Andrea Cepero / Sugey Morales1-6, 4-6
2024-06-19vs deDios (Crandon Park)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesIsabel Maestu / Mariana Salvioli vs Gema de Dios / Isabella Ratti2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDana Hamrick / Kristi Atkison vs Natalia Guendsechadze / Adriana Isaac2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Noboa / Debby Lichtner vs Ana Pastorino / Ileana Gill3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-06-05vs TeamForman2Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCristina Melendez / Dana Hamrick vs Mellissa Cili / Elsa Gonzalez6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRajni Agarwal / Mariana Salvioli vs Andrea Mientkiewicz / Juliana Matiz6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDebby Lichtner / Amanda Noboa vs Maricarmen Diazmiron / Elizabeth Ruiz Velasco3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Dana Hamrick
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.69
Amanda Noboa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Mariana Salvioli
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.67
Lisa Simpson
published
3.56
Isabel Maestu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
ELIANA BIGAI
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.31
Mayra Rosales Sixto
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Sara Cleveland
published
3.23
Debby Lichtner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Cristina Melendez
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.17
Kristi Atkison
published
3.13
Rajni Agarwal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Berenice Elguezabal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Maria Debacher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rajni Agarwal + Amanda Noboa9260% games+12.4% vs expected
Isabel Maestu + ELIANA BIGAI3550% games+11.2% vs expected
Mayra Rosales Sixto + Isabel Maestu7655% games+9.5% vs expected
Cristina Melendez + Isabel Maestu2540% games+2.5% vs expected
Amanda Noboa + Dana Hamrick8253% games+0.9% vs expected
Dana Hamrick + Lisa Simpson6449% games−2.5% vs expected
Debby Lichtner + Amanda Noboa368343% games−3.5% vs expected
Mariana Salvioli + Isabel Maestu1936% games−5.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dana Hamrick
138W–156L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Amanda Noboa
109W–130L career · 6 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Mariana Salvioli
40W–104L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
Lisa Simpson
16W–16L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Isabel Maestu
108W–93L career · 8 lines in 2024
32%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
ELIANA BIGAI
138W–129L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.55
3.5
Mayra Rosales Sixto
46W–98L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
Sara Cleveland
20W–24L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Debby Lichtner
49W–125L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Cristina Melendez
92W–82L career · 6 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
Kristi Atkison
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Rajni Agarwal
90W–65L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Berenice Elguezabal
45W–85L career · 4 lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.11
Maria Debacher
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.