Teams

PC-Happy Hour

2021 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.58 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-05-02vs GAC-Sets MachineWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmerson Clark / Lindy Bentley vs Michelle Anslinger / Danny Anslinger3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Smith / Anthony Smith vs Cindy Pielli / Adam Rahmlow6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJames Kirkham / Jadee Kirkham vs Christy Field / Wes Haynes7-5, 6-3
2021-05-02vs YTC-McLeanWon 20
W#1 DoublesEmerson Clark / Lindy Bentley vs Cynthia Kimel / Raymond Rust Jr6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoyce Donais / Don Donais vs Danny Mullins / Angela Stewart6-4, 6-3
2021-05-01vs YTC-FranklinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJames Kirkham / Jadee Kirkham vs Ryan Franklin / Anne Rojan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDon Donais / Joyce Donais vs Scott Ladd / Estelle Patten6-4, 6-3
2021-05-01vs CBRC-SamuelLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmerson Clark / Rebecca Allen vs Diana Titechko / Trevor Morrison3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAnthony Smith / Lisa Smith vs Angela Cragin / Sheng-Lun Tai6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJames Kirkham / Lindy Bentley vs Kristina Berg / Nikolla Qafoku3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Emerson Clark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
James Kirkham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Anthony Smith
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Don Donais
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Joyce Donais
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Jadee Kirkham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Lindy Bentley
published
Lisa Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Randy Gable
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Rebecca Allen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Smith + Anthony Smith11174% games+19.2% vs expected
Joyce Donais + Don Donais21758% games+4.8% vs expected
James Kirkham + Jadee Kirkham10652% games−0.3% vs expected
Lindy Bentley + Randy Gable404 matchesnot enough data
Jadee Kirkham + Randy Gable033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emerson Clark
71W–43L career · 3 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
3.5
James Kirkham
53W–61L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Anthony Smith
78W–15L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Don Donais
104W–75L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Joyce Donais
69W–40L career · 6 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Jadee Kirkham
42W–62L career · 2 lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
2.96
Lindy Bentley
25W–16L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Smith
33W–3L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Randy Gable
70W–27L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rebecca Allen
14W–22L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.