Teams

KY/HEN/MELANIE Humbert

2026 USTA COMBO DOUBLES 18 & OVER WINTER HENDERSON · 6.5 Ladies Combo

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-08vs KY/HEN/HUMBERT, MelanieWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelanie Humbert / Amelia DeMello vs Julie Flittner / Leanne Lester7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJill Carr / Stephanie Caton vs Paige Warren / Marilyn Dorsey6-0, 7-6
2026-03-01vs KY/HEN/HUMBERT, MelanieWon 20
W#1 DoublesSandy Stabenfeldt / Leah Marlow-Wedeking vs Leanne Lester / Paige Warren6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelanie Humbert / Jane Diehl vs Laurie Austin / Marilyn Dorsey6-3, 6-3
2026-02-22vs KY/HEN/HUMBERT, MelanieLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmelia DeMello / Jill Carr vs Laurie Austin / Paige Warren3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Humbert / Stephanie Caton vs Julie Flittner / Jennifer Haley2-6, 5-6
2026-02-08vs KY/HEN/HUMBERT, MelanieSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelanie Humbert / Leah Marlow-Wedeking vs Laurie Austin / Jennifer Haley2-6, 5-6
W#2 DoublesAmelia DeMello / Stephanie Caton vs Leanne Lester / Paige Warren6-3, 7-5
2026-01-18vs KY/HEN/HUMBERT, MelanieSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmelia DeMello / Jill Carr vs Jennifer Haley / Paige Warren6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeah Marlow-Wedeking / Stephanie Caton vs Julie Flittner / Leanne Lester0-6, 4-6
2026-01-11vs KY/HEN/HUMBERT, MelanieLost 02
L#1 DoublesSandy Stabenfeldt / Jill Carr vs Laurie Austin / Jennifer Haley1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Caton / Jane Diehl vs Julie Flittner / Paige Warren4-6, 3-6
2026-01-04vs KY/HEN/HUMBERT, MelanieLost 02
L#1 DoublesLeah Marlow-Wedeking / Amelia DeMello vs Leanne Lester / Paige Warren6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSandy Stabenfeldt / Stephanie Caton vs Marilyn Dorsey / Julie Flittner2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.5 Ladies Combo
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/HEN/HUMBERT, Melanie5281327208
2KY/HEN/MELANIE Humbert2561531218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Melanie Humbert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Sandy Stabenfeldt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Leah Marlow-Wedeking
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.82
Amelia DeMello
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.62
Stephanie Caton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Jane Diehl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Jill Carr
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leah Marlow-Wedeking + Amelia DeMello2542% games+6.0% vs expected
Jane Diehl + Amelia DeMello0725% games−7.1% vs expected
Jane Diehl + Leah Marlow-Wedeking2440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Humbert
42W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.20
Sandy Stabenfeldt
58W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.15
Leah Marlow-Wedeking
32W–71L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Amelia DeMello
29W–50L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Stephanie Caton
3W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
Jane Diehl
27W–83L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Jill Carr
11W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.