Teams

OAK PK CM8.5A

2023 COMBO · Men 8.5

18 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-29vs MODESTO F RC CM8.5AWon 20
W#1 DoublesThomas Guillena / Vidal Pedraza vs Justin Zertuche / Andrew Zajac6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Narciso / Charanjit Dhillon vs Alejandro Alfaro / Hernando Zamora0-6, 3-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
David Gutierrez
published 4.5
4.26
Pierre Ladion
published
4.09
Vidal Pedraza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Rajiv Punjya
published
4.00
Rohith Kolli
published
3.94
Antonio Dalupan
published 4.5
3.94
Thomas Guillena
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Imran Mazhar
published 4
3.75
Arnold Soleta
published 4
3.73
Ronald Cabalbag
published
3.71
Charanjit Dhillon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Ronald Rafanan
published
3.64
Azam Qureshi
published 4
3.61
Khai Vang
published 4
2.93
Fred Dasalla
published 3.5
Vishal Nayyar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Azam Qureshi + Imran Mazhar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Gutierrez
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
4.27
Pierre Ladion
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Ignacio A Valdovinos
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vidal Pedraza
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2023
25%75%<1%
4.09
Rajiv Punjya
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
4.00
Rohith Kolli
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
4.00
4.5
Antonio Dalupan
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
3.94
Thomas Guillena
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Imran Mazhar
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Arnold Soleta
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Anand Prasad Rajaraman
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ronald Cabalbag
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Charanjit Dhillon
8W–0L career · 1 line in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
Ronald Rafanan
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Azam Qureshi
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Khai Vang
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Fred Dasalla
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.93
Vishal Nayyar
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.