← Teams

Ioannou

2022 Coppermine Mixed 18 & Over · Coppermine Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.93 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-15vs NelsonWon 2–0
W#1 DoublesPatricia Stavros / David Roggen vs Kimberly Ford / James Wroe6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Johns / Christine Ioannou vs Walter Parrish / Angela Parker6-3, 6-1
2021-12-11vs NelsonWon 2–0
W#1 DoublesEva Simmons-O'Brien / John Blue vs Anthony Carle / Kimberly Ford7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJoan Garlow / Tom Somers vs Angela Parker / Andrew Mullins1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-12-08vs AkcamLost 1–2
L#1 DoublesPatricia Stavros / David Roggen vs Lolita Blair / Emad Nekoo3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristine Ioannou / David Johns vs Audrey Liu / Sean Der6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEva Simmons-O'Brien / John Blue vs DONALD CRAWLEY / Susan Rhee6-7, 5-7
2021-12-04vs NelsonLost 0–1
L#3 DoublesPatricia Stavros / David Johns vs Anthony Carle / Angela Parker4-6, 2-6
2021-12-01vs AkcamLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesTom Somers / Patricia Stavros vs Beyza Akcam / Jared Fly1-6, 4-6
2021-11-13vs AkcamLost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJoan Garlow / Tom Somers vs Merve Gurlu / Matthew Geppi1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Blue / Eva Simmons-O'Brien vs Virginia Fung / Ali Kart3-6, 3-6
2021-11-06Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesEva Simmons-O'Brien / John Blue vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-10-29vs AkcamLost 0–1
L#3 DoublesVince Sbarra / Anne Blue vs Audrey Liu / Henry Cha7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Coppermine Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
John Blue
published —
3.87
David Johns
published 4
3.81
Patricia Stavros
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.80
Joan Garlow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Christine Ioannou
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Anne Blue
published 4
3.67
Vince Sbarra
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
Eva Simmons-O'Brien
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Ioannou + Vince Sbarra3–251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—
John Blue
18W–22L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
4.09
4
David Johns
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Patricia Stavros
129W–69L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Joan Garlow
156W–129L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Christine Ioannou
152W–115L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Anne Blue
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Vince Sbarra
181W–167L career · 1 line in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Eva Simmons-O'Brien
79W–66L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.