Teams

Shukla, Lindsey

2026 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Women 5.5

11 players · average NTRP 2.88 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-26vs Chen, AnneLost 03
L#1 DoublesRomy Abboud / Sage Conner vs Wenjie Wu / Megan Lyon6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLeah Conner / Tina Wells vs Britini Breazeale / Haiying Anne Chen0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAdrienne Aikens / Andrea Hart-Crovetto vs Monique Holmes / Kym Gore0-6, 3-6
2026-08-19vs Welch, JanaLost 03
L#1 DoublesLindsey Shukla / Adrienne Aikens vs Mckinley Welch / Libby Everett3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRomy Abboud / Andrea Hart-Crovetto vs Mary Hollingsworth / Ashley Ewing1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLeah Conner / Tina Wells vs Jana Welch / Heather Drummond1-6, 4-6
2026-08-19vs Todd, ChloeWon 30
W#1 DoublesAriana Palacios / Romy Abboud vs Jenna Gaines / Erin Barrios6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTina Wells / Sage Conner vs Shelby Thomas / Sorena Vinson6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAdrienne Aikens / Lindsey Shukla vs Katy Barham / Hilary Childress6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Ariana Palacios
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Chase King
published 3
2.60
Lindsey Shukla
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.49
Sage Conner
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
Andrea Hart-Crovetto
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.38
2.15
Adrienne Aikens
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.04
Romy Abboud
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.95
Tracy Rhinewalt
published
1.92
Tina Wells
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Leah Conner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sage Conner + Chase King2446% games+5.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ariana Palacios
23W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Chase King
29W–26L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63
Lindsey Shukla
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%23%77%
2.60
Sage Conner
17W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
3
Andrea Hart-Crovetto
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
Melissa Kaye Mccombs
5W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
2.5
Adrienne Aikens
8W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
Romy Abboud
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Tracy Rhinewalt
9W–12L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Tina Wells
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Leah Conner
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.