Teams

Tri-Angels/Podell/Menlo Park

2024 Tri-Level 3.5 · 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-10-26vs Triple Threat!/Banse/Morgan HillWon 30
W#1 DoublesElani Phan / Tiffany Liew vs Sisine Mercado / Lisa Campbell6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStephanie King / Anja Brau vs Thuy Nguyen / Yui Tantiyavarong6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesShani Podell / Michele Wang vs Julie Boncher / Pegah Seddighian7-6, 6-3
2024-10-25vs PuffGirls/Tsujimoto/Palo AltoWon 21
W#1 DoublesTiffany Liew / Elani Phan vs Ilana Volfin / Jenny Wang6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Backus / Heather Green vs Tien-Hsin Lin / Kristine Tan4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesShani Podell / Cheryl Kushida vs Alicia Sim / Yiwen Xie6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Kiran F Narsinh
published
4.06
Tiffany Liew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Elani Phan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Anja Brau
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.93
Cheryl Kushida
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Alexandra Olsen
published 4
3.78
Shani Podell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Lisa Backus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Yemia Hashimoto
published
3.53
Michele Wang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Kalina Stephani
published
3.34
Alicia Barco
published 3.5
Jasmin Zaragoza
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alicia Barco + Yemia Hashimoto044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kiran F Narsinh
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
4.21
Tiffany Liew
14W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.06
Elani Phan
13W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
4.5
Anja Brau
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
50%50%<1%
4.00
4
Cheryl Kushida
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Alexandra Olsen
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Shani Podell
27W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Lisa Backus
57W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Yemia Hashimoto
37W–35L career · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.57
Michele Wang
21W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.53
Kalina Stephani
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Alicia Barco
78W–66L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
Jasmin Zaragoza
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.