Teams

Glam Slam

2026 18&over Women Day Fall · 3.0

18 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-02vs Centercourt RacquettesWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Luong / Svetlana Page-Natoli vs Kimberly Bauer / Jill Assante2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-11-18vs Hot ShotsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Robins / Carla Spear vs Pranee Tonkaew / Helen Black1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesIzabela Raczkowska vs Meredith Pierson7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesColeen Mills / Ruthann Kerr vs Joanna Parker-Lentz / Becky Lixu Liang4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJamie Kruger / SALENA MAHR vs Deirdre Hatfield / Michelle Kurzer5-7, 6-3
2025-11-11vs SAC LadiesWon 10
W#3 DoublesPatricia O'Byrne / Erika Rains vs Nicole Marino / Raquel DaSilva6-1, 6-1
2025-11-04vs Smash and DashWon 10
W#2 DoublesSvetlana Page-Natoli / SALENA MAHR vs Heather Meyers / Anna Walz6-2, 6-2
2025-10-28vs Crestmont Miss HitsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Cascardi / Elizabeth Robins vs Tina Berman / Wanda Jacey6-3, 6-1
2025-10-14vs West OrangeWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Luong / Svetlana Page-Natoli vs Marissa Pick / Robbie Bloom7-6, 6-1
2025-10-07vs Sugar and SliceWon 10
W#2 DoublesPatricia O'Byrne / Lisa Luong vs Andrea Mayes / Marci Clark7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-30vs Love and DeucesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSALENA MAHR / Elizabeth Robins vs Jennifer Johnson / Kristen Jones6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPatricia O'Byrne / Alejandra Gomez de Reyes vs Holly Shaw / Mary Cryder1-6, 3-6
2025-09-16vs The NomadsWon 31
W#1 DoublesRuthann Kerr / Madhuri Reddy vs Yuriria Alanis Rodriguez / Gabriela Galvan6-3, 5-7
W#1 SinglesIzabela Raczkowska vs Julie Savage6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLeigh Allocca / SALENA MAHR vs Emily Groendyke / Lorraine Kent6-7, 4-5
W#3 DoublesGhizlane Brown / Erika Rains vs Julie Longa / Jane Rothenberg6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Michele Cascardi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.04
Elizabeth Robins
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.99
Erika Rains
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Izabela Raczkowska
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.94
SALENA MAHR
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Madhuri Reddy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Ruthann Kerr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Coleen Mills
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Svetlana Page-Natoli
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.74
Patricia O'Byrne
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Carla Spear
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Ghizlane Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jamie Kruger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Leigh Allocca
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lisa Luong
published
Mai Joaquin
published
Ritu Bahal
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Robins + SALENA MAHR5070% games+9.5% vs expected
SALENA MAHR + Coleen Mills9460% games+2.7% vs expected
Coleen Mills + Ruthann Kerr4649% games−0.5% vs expected
SALENA MAHR + Leigh Allocca044 matchesnot enough data
Svetlana Page-Natoli + SALENA MAHR303 matchesnot enough data
Madhuri Reddy + Ruthann Kerr303 matchesnot enough data
Coleen Mills + Erika Rains123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michele Cascardi
42W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
Elizabeth Robins
31W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
Erika Rains
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
Izabela Raczkowska
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
SALENA MAHR
30W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Madhuri Reddy
34W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%22%
2.89
Ruthann Kerr
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Coleen Mills
36W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Svetlana Page-Natoli
17W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Patricia O'Byrne
24W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Carla Spear
35W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
2.5
Alejandra Gomez de Reyes
6W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ghizlane Brown
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jamie Kruger
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Leigh Allocca
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Luong
3W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mai Joaquin
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ritu Bahal
10W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.