Teams

GEPTA-4.0-Adult/40+W(Dominguez)(EPTC#5)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Alejandra Ostos
usually #2 Singles 30%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 4
3.43
Beatriz Bermudez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.31
Blanca Olmos
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Ana Dominguez
usually #2 Doubles 34%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.15
Cecilia Trejo
usually #3 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.13
Claudia Abbud
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3.5
Dinorah Martel
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Estela Abelleira
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published
Georgina Munoz
usually #1 Doubles 28%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
Imelda Angulo
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Maria Vazquez de Medina
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Virginia Hernandez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Xanthe Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Hernandez + Xanthe Phillips13956% games+5.2% vs expected
Claudia Abbud + Georgina Munoz41539% games+0.5% vs expected
Estela Abelleira + Blanca Olmos11960% gamesnot enough data
Ana Dominguez + Estela Abelleira12658% gamesnot enough data
Ana Dominguez + Blanca Olmos9756% gamesnot enough data
Dinorah Martel + Blanca Olmos4744% gamesnot enough data
Dinorah Martel + Maria Vazquez de Medina3642% gamesnot enough data
Dinorah Martel + Ana Dominguez3542% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alejandra Ostos
51W–13L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Beatriz Bermudez
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Blanca Olmos
99W–76L career · 43 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Ana Dominguez
50W–50L career · 39 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Cecilia Trejo
34W–28L career · 21 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Claudia Abbud
55W–104L career · 20 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Dinorah Martel
19W–30L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Estela Abelleira
42W–43L career · 34 lines in 2025
not enough data
Georgina Munoz
35W–78L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Imelda Angulo
29W–34L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maria Vazquez de Medina
24W–43L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Virginia Hernandez
82W–70L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Xanthe Phillips
68W–34L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.