Teams

Escambia/Foster

2022 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-13Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCharlie Skelton vs Zack Buhlmann4-6, 4-6
2022-07-06vs Lopez - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesLubomir Kaderjak / Rick Cuny vs Jeff Crigler / Won June Jong6-3, 6-4
2022-06-22vs Lopez - RS ClayWon 20
W#2 DoublesValentim Goncalves / Rick Cuny vs James Johnson / Hiep Du6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCharlie Skelton / Paul Einhart vs Cosme Barrios / Michael Yager6-4, 7-5
2022-06-15vs Lopez - RS ClaySplit 11
L#1 SinglesSteven King vs Quoc-Kien Doan - (DQ)*3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRick Cuny / William McClelland vs Cosme Barrios / Zack Buhlmann7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-08vs Lopez - RS ClayWon 30
W#1 DoublesSteven King / William Mitchem vs Hossein Maleki / RAYMOND LOPEZ6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMansfield Coe / Lubomir Kaderjak vs Cosme Barrios / Zack Buhlmann6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCharlie Skelton / Valentim Goncalves vs James Johnson / Jeff Crigler6-3, 7-5
2022-06-01vs Lopez - RS ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesValentim Goncalves / Steven King vs RAYMOND LOPEZ / Hossein Maleki6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCharlie Skelton vs Quoc-Kien Doan - (DQ)*2-6, 2-6
2022-05-18vs Lopez - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharlie Skelton / Valentim Goncalves vs Jared Veltman / James Johnson6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Hayden Essary
published 4.5
4.36
Lubomir Kaderjak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.33
Dana Foster
published 4.5
4.26
Charlie Skelton
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.11
Paul Einhart
published
4.10
Steven King
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.83
Rick Cuny
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Daniel Herman
published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlie Skelton + Lubomir Kaderjak6166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hayden Essary
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
4.38
4.5
Lubomir Kaderjak
183W–34L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
4.36
4.5
Dana Foster
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Charlie Skelton
34W–24L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
4.26
Paul Einhart
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
Steven King
30W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
4.10
Rick Cuny
100W–65L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4.5
Daniel Herman
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
3.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.