Teams

BHSC-Burns

2025 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-14vs ACAC AcersWon 10
W#1 SinglesOmar Garriott vs Pat BRadley6-1, 6-4
2025-06-11vs AHS PATA Cats-WelchLost 01
L#1 SinglesOmar Garriott vs Samuel Tanner1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-05-31vs ACAC AcersWon 10
W#2 DoublesOmar Garriott / Todd Hochrein vs Gregory Parrish / Pablo Barrague6-3, 6-2
2025-05-17vs AHS PATA Cats-WelchWon 10
W#2 DoublesOmar Garriott / David Burns vs Marcello de Montbel / Long Duong6-1, 6-0
2025-05-06vs AHS PATA Cats-WelchWon 10
W#1 DoublesOmar Garriott / Todd Hochrein vs Rick Aasen / Marcello de Montbel3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-04-05vs AHS PATA Cats-WelchLost 23
W#1 DoublesLogan Martin / Chris Stewart vs Paul Lorenzo / John Morgan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMichael Weiner vs Samuel Tanner0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Serpico / Shalendra Varma vs Dave Contini / Adam Healey4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesMatthew Hedstrom vs Timothy Kimble2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBill Evanow / Rajkumar Venkatesan vs Bram Braakman / Alex Roumi0-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Omar Garriott
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.53
Hans Gerling
published 3.5
3.52
David Burns
published 3.5
3.48
Logan Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Todd Hochrein
published
3.30
Bill Evanow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Shalendra Varma
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Matthew Hedstrom
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.86
Rajkumar Venkatesan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Weiner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Robert Serpico
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Logan Martin + Matthew Hedstrom224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Omar Garriott
53W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.62
3.5
Hans Gerling
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.53
3.5
David Burns
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Logan Martin
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Todd Hochrein
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Giambattista Martano
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Bill Evanow
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shalendra Varma
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Matthew Hedstrom
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Rajkumar Venkatesan
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%14%
2.86
Michael Weiner
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robert Serpico
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.