Teams

KY/LOU/MANN/RUSSELL

2022 USTA FALL 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

19 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Jennifer Kang
published
3.92
Jody Wedge
published
3.87
Rebecca McClellan
published
3.80
El Shelton
published 4
3.80
Stacy Highfield
published
3.80
Vanessa Ruppe
published
Carrie Osting
published 4
3.74
Holly Meadows
published 4
3.73
Caitlin Mann
published 4
3.66
Carol Steiden
published 4
3.58
Keren Benabou
published
3.56
Susan Maguire
published
3.54
Tara Scanlan
published
3.45
Ketti Stropkay
published
3.40
Shelby Russell
published
Lisa Dahlem
published
Patricia Maddox
published
Rona Martins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Highfield + Rebecca McClellan19264% games+5.3% vs expected
Susan Maguire + Vanessa Ruppe224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Maguire + Jody Wedge224 matchesnot enough data
Keren Benabou + Shelby Russell224 matchesnot enough data
Carol Steiden + Susan Maguire123 matchesnot enough data
El Shelton + Vanessa Ruppe123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Kang
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
4.01
Jody Wedge
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.92
Rebecca McClellan
53W–37L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
El Shelton
28W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Stacy Highfield
31W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Vanessa Ruppe
31W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Carrie Osting
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Holly Meadows
14W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Caitlin Mann
21W–7L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Carol Steiden
15W–12L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.66
Keren Benabou
18W–15L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Susan Maguire
17W–34L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Christine Keto Campbell
22W–11L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
Tara Scanlan
27W–25L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Ketti Stropkay
21W–13L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
3.45
Shelby Russell
61W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Lisa Dahlem
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Maddox
5W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rona Martins
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.