Teams

FK/Greene- 50+ 6.5 Combo - Greene Team

2026 Marion Combo 50 & Over Fall · 6.5 Combo 50 & Over - Women

20 players · average NTRP 3.20 / REGION_2

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 upcoming
Sep 20 12:00 PM
Fort King Tennis Center
Sep 26 9:00 AM
Fort King Tennis Center
Oct 4 12:00 PM
Fort King Tennis Center
Oct 11 12:00 PM
Fort King Tennis Center
Oct 17 9:00 AM
Fort King Tennis Center
Oct 24 10:00 AM
Jim Legrone Memorial Park
Nov 1 2:00 PM
Glenview Champions Tennis Club
Nov 8 12:00 PM
Fort King Tennis Center
Nov 14 10:00 AM
Jim Legrone Memorial Park

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 50 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Hollie Powell
published
3.28
Laura Flanagan
published
3.18
Jennifer Halinski
published 3.5
3.17
3.09
Margarita Posada
published
3.08
Maggie Berardi
published
3.06
Janet Greene
published
2.91
Debby McCoy
published 3
2.90
Mary Sievers
published
2.89
Cindy Hinton
published 3
2.84
Ronda Knutson
published
2.74
Laura Roberson
published
2.74
NANCY TUTEN
published
2.66
Colette Widrin
published 3
2.65
Nancy Binko
published
Marianne Zitnick
published
Mercy Ford
published
Michelle Smith
published
Rebecca Durham
published
Rhonda Sangster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Christie Ybanez + Hollie Powell3251% gamesnot enough data
Laura Roberson + Cindy Hinton4164% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Binko + Ronda Knutson224 matchesnot enough data
Janet Greene + Debby McCoy404 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Hinton + NANCY TUTEN213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hollie Powell
26W–70L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Laura Flanagan
30W–59L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Jennifer Halinski
61W–70L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Sharon Christie Ybanez
72W–72L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Margarita Posada
4W–9L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Maggie Berardi
13W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.08
Janet Greene
26W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Debby McCoy
12W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Mary Sievers
12W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
2.90
3
Cindy Hinton
27W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Ronda Knutson
30W–22L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Laura Roberson
25W–9L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
NANCY TUTEN
14W–7L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Colette Widrin
11W–3L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Nancy Binko
4W–15L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65
Marianne Zitnick
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mercy Ford
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Smith
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rebecca Durham
28W–31L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rhonda Sangster
125W–102L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.