Teams

Pa.Cochran40A

2024 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-26vs Ta.LeFevre40ALost 03
L#1 SinglesLisa Lathram vs Meimei Wessinger4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRegina Davis / Mary Strothmann vs Tara LeFevre / Jacqueline Wolborsky6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPaula Cochran / Mary Ann Enzweiler vs Averil Glover / Gwen Noble3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-04-25vs Je.Wolborsky40A3.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesWendy Hanshew / Kara Hornada vs Evelyn Andino / Heather Bilderback6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesLisa Lathram vs Paula Westregard Bjorklund1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Strothmann / Christine Mccorquodale vs CARLA FIELDS / Julie Newson3-6, 2-6
2024-04-18vs Ma.Schantz40ASplit 22
W#1 DoublesWendy Hanshew / Regina Davis vs Kylie Harris / Jennifer McCown6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLisa Lathram vs McKenzie Keenan Osman6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMary Strothmann / Lora Tripp vs Susan Rose / Cindy McCullough4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPaula Cochran / Mary Ann Enzweiler vs Andrea Pfeiffer / Brandy Foreman2-6, 1-6
2024-04-04vs Cr.Smith40ALost 13
L#1 DoublesLisa Lathram / Bernadette David-Yerumo vs Holly Camak / Jolyne Taylor0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesChristine Mccorquodale vs Kristen Welsh1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKara Hornada / Wendy Hanshew vs Sarah Maynard / Crystal Smith7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLora Tripp / Mary Ann Enzweiler vs Ramsay Younger / Emy Hanson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-03-21vs Ki.Johnson40ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesWendy Hanshew / Regina Davis vs Christine Rowe / Meike Schacht6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChristine Mccorquodale / Mary Ann Enzweiler vs Phyllis Soltz / Kathleen Lis2-6, 0-6
2024-03-14vs Ch.Jenkins40ALost 13
W#1 DoublesWendy Hanshew / Kellie Snider vs Julie Fleming / Robin Sealey6-7, 2-1
L#1 SinglesLisa Lathram vs Christina Jenkins1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRegina Davis / Paula Cochran vs Jennifer Holloman / Lisa Kempf0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Strothmann / Bernadette David-Yerumo vs Emily Larson / Heather Tuttle1-6, 2-6
2024-03-13vs An.Willard40ALost 04
L#1 DoublesWendy Hanshew / Kellie Snider vs Maggie LaPlante / Maggie Patterson7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChristine Mccorquodale vs Mary Margaret Patton0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMary Ann Enzweiler / Paula Cochran vs Toni Paladino / Lynn Trefzger4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Lathram / Carol Vervaert vs Sarah Glover / Annette Tavernaro7-5, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Kara Hornada
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Wendy Hanshew
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.17
Regina Davis
published
3.16
Kellie Snider
published
3.10
Lisa Lathram
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.98
Mary Strothmann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Amy Ellis
published 3
2.75
Carol Vervaert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Mary Ann Enzweiler
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.65
Christine Mccorquodale
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3
2.54
Paula Cochran
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Hanshew + Kara Hornada262051% games+1.5% vs expected
Paula Cochran + Mary Ann Enzweiler62639% games−5.5% vs expected
Paula Cochran + Christine Mccorquodale11533% games−7.3% vs expected
Lisa Lathram + Mary Ann Enzweiler6646% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Lathram + Carol Vervaert4352% gamesnot enough data
Paula Cochran + Lisa Lathram1526% gamesnot enough data
Christine Mccorquodale + Carol Vervaert0538% gamesnot enough data
Mary Ann Enzweiler + Carol Vervaert1439% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kara Hornada
135W–99L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Wendy Hanshew
111W–144L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
Regina Davis
27W–45L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Kellie Snider
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Lisa Lathram
42W–89L career · type A · 6 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Mary Strothmann
111W–114L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Amy Ellis
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Carol Vervaert
79W–126L career · 1 line in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Mary Ann Enzweiler
36W–90L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Christine Mccorquodale
37W–166L career · 9 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
2.65
3
Paula Cochran
28W–117L career · 4 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.