Teams

Huffman/Knoxville

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League-Knoxville · 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-16vs Smith/KnoxvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesMegan Haselschwerdt / Paola Martinez vs Angie Epps / Dawn Coleman6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTammy Shrivalle vs Lori DeRoos4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPatsy Fischer / LOURDES BLANDINO vs Stacey Wright / Kelly Crawford7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCindi Mooney vs Amanda Mize3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWendi Arnold / Angie Goodwyn vs Emily Smead / Pam Womack6-7, 6-7
2024-10-26vs Smith/KnoxvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesPaola Martinez / Jennifer Collins vs Dawn Coleman / Shelly Ren5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesIsabel Cunningham vs Lori DeRoos6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Huffman / Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez vs Amanda Smith / Ann Brady4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMegan Haselschwerdt vs Stacey Wright6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPatsy Fischer / Wendi Arnold vs Cynthia Reed / Anna Taylor7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
HAILEY NEDS
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.55
Debi English
published 3.5
3.49
LOURDES BLANDINO
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Paola Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Megan Haselschwerdt
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.35
Jennifer Collins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Isabel Cunningham
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.31
Tammy Shrivalle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.30
Wendi Arnold
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.16
Cindi Mooney
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Angie Goodwyn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Lisa Huffman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Patsy Fischer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Erica Zuhr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Collins + Angie Goodwyn6167% games+13.9% vs expected
Debi English + Megan Haselschwerdt6165% games+12.6% vs expected
Angie Goodwyn + Wendi Arnold6457% games+4.8% vs expected
Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez + Paola Martinez3250% games+2.3% vs expected
Isabel Cunningham + Patsy Fischer8159% games+0.3% vs expected
Lisa Huffman + Paola Martinez6254% games−0.7% vs expected
Jennifer Collins + Wendi Arnold314 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Huffman + Megan Haselschwerdt224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

HAILEY NEDS
20W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
3.5
Debi English
35W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
LOURDES BLANDINO
36W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Paola Martinez
56W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez
17W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Megan Haselschwerdt
25W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
Jennifer Collins
28W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Isabel Cunningham
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Tammy Shrivalle
43W–59L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Wendi Arnold
27W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Cindi Mooney
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Angie Goodwyn
40W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Lisa Huffman
17W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Patsy Fischer
22W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Erica Zuhr
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.