Teams

MWood Fall singles

2022 Capital Fall 40 & Over Singles League · 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-10-10vs Pataki40+Singles_FallLost 01
L#2 SinglesChris Fuhrer vs Kevin Sibillia2-6, 1-6
2022-09-19vs Pataki40+Singles_FallLost 02
L#2 SinglesChris Fuhrer vs Geoff Knight0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesThomas Zietlow vs Ken Glanville5-7, 4-6
2022-09-04vs SHoffman4.0Singles22Won 10
W#1 SinglesThomas Zietlow vs Larry Leins6-3, 7-5
2022-08-22vs Pataki40+Singles_FallLost 01
L#3 SinglesThomas Zietlow vs Istvan Pataki1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Pete Vammino
published
3.40
Samir Naik
published
3.37
Mark Wood
published
3.35
Thomas Zietlow
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Jeff Dooley
published
3.13
Chris Fuhrer
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Miguel Materin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pete Vammino
1W–12L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
Samir Naik
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.40
Mark Wood
15W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Thomas Zietlow
42W–66L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Jeff Dooley
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Chris Fuhrer
73W–98L career · 2 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
Miguel Materin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.