Teams

LATA40/Williams/LCTC

2026 Combo 40 & Over-STA · Adult Women - 6.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 7 played
Sep 8 6:30 PM
Lexington County Tennis Complex
Sep 15 6:30 PM
Lexington County Tennis Complex
Sep 22 6:30 PM
Lexington County Tennis Complex
2026-09-01vs LATA40/Mathews/CAMPLost 03
L#1 DoublesShelby Provencher / Theresa Rhodes vs Missy Graczyk / Anne Belue6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLily DeGracia / Diane Krell vs Page Edwards / Barbara Belquist0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Fuller / Allie Sairam vs Wendel Franklin / Willine Gilliard1-6, 0-6
2026-08-25vs LATA40/Squires/LCTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesTheresa Rhodes / Patty Foy vs Kris Sutton / Allison Marsh6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDiane Krell / Nancy Fuller vs Elizabeth Regan / Carmen Goulet0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Barnes / Allie Sairam vs Rita Squires / Collins Baker5-7, 0-6
2026-08-18vs LATA40/Stewart/MPWon 21
W#1 DoublesLily DeGracia / Patty Foy vs Cresta Stewart / Lynn Thomas7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShelby Provencher / Theresa Rhodes vs Lisa Maylath / Anna Mallett6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Fuller / Diane Krell vs Fran Eleazer / April Holt4-6, 6-7
2026-08-11vs LATA40/Burton/LCTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeather Roth / Shelby Provencher vs Laurie Pool / Jennifer Asbill4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTheresa Rhodes / Diane Krell vs Megan Fredrickson / Patty Spires1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Fuller / Barbara Barnes vs Courtney Stein / Theresa Marcott6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-08-04vs LATA40/Sojourner/CAMPLost 02
L#1 DoublesTheresa Rhodes / Diane Krell vs Sally Fox / Aimee Zmroczek3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Fuller / Barbara Barnes vs Johnette Jones / Sarah Mayle1-6, 3-6
2026-07-28vs LATA40/Mathews/CAMPLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatty Foy / Shelby Provencher vs Missy Graczyk / Anne Belue6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTheresa Rhodes / Diane Krell vs Debra Sklar / Barbara Belquist1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Williams / Barbara Barnes vs Susie Leroy / Libby Hagins1-6, 2-6
2026-07-21vs LATA40/Squires/LCTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesLily DeGracia / Patty Foy vs Janet Buhrow / Kristin Wood2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShelby Provencher / Theresa Rhodes vs Maira Trimble / Vandrea Lang4-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Roth / Diane Krell vs Carmen Goulet / Arlene Wilkes3-6, 1-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · Adult Women - 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LATA40/Burton/LCTC4111410100
2LATA40/Mathews/CAMP4111411111
3LATA40/Stewart/MP2154980
4LATA40/Sojourner/CAMP22661299
5LATA40/Squires/LCTC146919152
6LATA40/Williams/LCTC0401224143

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Shelby Provencher
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.06
Patty Foy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Lily DeGracia
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Allie Sairam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Barbara Barnes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Diane Krell
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Heather Roth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Fuller
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Patricia Williams
published
Theresa Rhodes
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patty Foy + Lily DeGracia2938% games−10.1% vs expected
Theresa Rhodes + Diane Krell044 matchesnot enough data
Heather Roth + Shelby Provencher044 matchesnot enough data
Heather Roth + Diane Krell044 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Fuller + Allie Sairam033 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Rhodes + Shelby Provencher123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shelby Provencher
59W–63L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Patty Foy
4W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Lily DeGracia
6W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.84
3
Allie Sairam
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Barbara Barnes
5W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Diane Krell
0W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
Heather Roth
1W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Fuller
0W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Williams
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Theresa Rhodes
2W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.