Teams

Munshell 4.0

2024 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.69 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-08-28vs SoloistsLost 01
L#3 SinglesCintya Leveque vs Chanpen Teeranon2-6, 2-6
2024-08-20vs No PressureWon 20
W#2 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Sueyun Hsieh6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAmy LaMoure vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-13vs My HOmiesLost 01
L#2 SinglesCatherine Zimmermann vs Yiziying Chen1-6, 1-6
2024-08-04vs No PressureSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAmy LaMoure vs Cheryl Risell2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Sueyun Hsieh6-2, 6-1
2024-07-31vs My HOmiesLost 01
L#1 SinglesCatherine Zimmermann vs Kim Dowd1-6, 2-6
2024-07-27vs SoloistsSplit 11
W#2 SinglesRuzica Ragontse vs Chanpen Teeranon6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesCintya Leveque vs Jessica Somers1-6, 1-6
2024-07-22Won 10
W#3 SinglesCintya Leveque vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-18vs My HOmiesLost 01
L#3 SinglesAmy LaMoure vs Layna Kelly1-6, 2-6
2024-07-15vs SoloistsLost 02
L#1 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Tina Halley2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAmy LaMoure vs Christine Alewine3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Ruzica Ragontse
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.80
Paru Rellan
published
3.69
Sarah Schrieber
published
3.69
Jean Acuna
published
3.63
Tana Jankowiak
published 4
3.58
Amy LaMoure
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.50
Bari Abensohn
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Cintya Leveque
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Catherine Zimmermann
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Deborah Alexander
published 3.5
3.09
Tim Munshell
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy LaMoure + Cintya Leveque224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ruzica Ragontse
84W–74L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.93
Paru Rellan
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
Sarah Schrieber
42W–44L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
Jean Acuna
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Tana Jankowiak
103W–71L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Amy LaMoure
172W–217L career · 4 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Bari Abensohn
96W–87L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.50
3.5
Cintya Leveque
299W–233L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Catherine Zimmermann
17W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Deborah Alexander
no matches on record · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Tim Munshell
360W–260L career · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.