Teams

RFC:TBD:Disch

2022 ME Adult 40 & Over Men · 4.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-06-08vs RFC:TBD:WoodsWon 20
W#1 DoublesRogier Henny / Gregg Lipton vs David Dealaman / Eric Driscoll6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRobert Disch / Ronald Chicoine vs Stephan Woods / Steven Richard6-3, 6-1
2022-06-08vs RFC:TBD:WoodsWon 30
W#1 DoublesRogier Henny / Ronald Chicoine vs Steven Mercier / Steven Richard6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDmitry Bam vs Stephan Woods6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGregg Lipton / Jason White vs David Dealaman / Eric Driscoll6-4, 6-4
2022-05-22vs RFC:TBD:WoodsWon 30
W#1 DoublesOwen Patrick / Jerry Lin vs David Dealaman / Steven Mercier7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEric Nixon / Todd Herrmann vs Richard Pickering / Eric Driscoll6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJason White / Bert Cole vs Steven Richard / Stephan Woods6-1, 6-1
2022-05-22vs RFC:TBD:WoodsWon 30
W#1 DoublesRogier Henny / Owen Patrick vs Stephan Woods / Jim Glanville6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRobert Disch / Eric Nixon vs David Dealaman / Steven Mercier6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBert Cole / Todd Herrmann vs Eric Driscoll / Richard Pickering6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RFC:TBD:Disch40160052
2RFC:TBD:Woods0401632195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Eric Nixon
published 4.5
4.29
Owen Patrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Bert Cole
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Gregg Lipton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.23
Jerry Lin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Dmitry Bam
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.98
Robert Disch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jason White
published
Rogier Henny
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ronald Chicoine
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Todd Herrmann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jerry Lin + Owen Patrick2450% games+0.2% vs expected
Gregg Lipton + Todd Herrmann4541% gamesnot enough data
Robert Disch + Ronald Chicoine303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eric Nixon
14W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
4.34
Owen Patrick
36W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Bert Cole
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Gregg Lipton
10W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Jerry Lin
24W–41L career · 1 line in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Dmitry Bam
46W–41L career · 1 line in 2022
40%60%<1%
4.03
Robert Disch
68W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.98
Jason White
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rogier Henny
46W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ronald Chicoine
24W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Todd Herrmann
29W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.