Teams

LifeTime Frisco/Trang M4.0

2024 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S M. League

22 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for S M. League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Rajesh Mishra
published
3.98
Cody Blanchard
published 4
3.92
Edgar Martinez
published
3.86
Jae Shim
published
3.85
Robert Wertz
published
3.81
Srinivasan Metta
published
3.81
Daniel Cornish
published 4
3.79
Daniel Gutierrez
published 4
Chad Carlquist
published 4
3.71
Sarosh Nayar
published
3.68
Brent Scott
published 4
3.63
Hien Trang
published
3.54
Nitin Kudikala
published
Feyera Milkessa
published
Hunter Kael
published
Jordan Rai
published
Keith Robinson
published
Marc Travillian
published
Matthew Sombito
published
Max Fannin
published
Robin Hurtado
published
Zach Poole
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Cornish + Jae Shim11361% games+6.0% vs expected
Robert Wertz + Hien Trang213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rajesh Mishra
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Cody Blanchard
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.98
Edgar Martinez
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.92
Jae Shim
27W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.86
Robert Wertz
13W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
Srinivasan Metta
18W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Daniel Cornish
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Daniel Gutierrez
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Chad Carlquist
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarosh Nayar
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Brent Scott
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Hien Trang
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
Nitin Kudikala
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.54
Feyera Milkessa
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Hunter Kael
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jordan Rai
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Keith Robinson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marc Travillian
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Matthew Sombito
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Max Fannin
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robin Hurtado
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Zach Poole
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.