← Teams

WHRC-Jennings

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.42 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Matt Thayer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 10% · published 3.5
3.34
Janis Locenieks
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Piero Fenato
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
—
Matt Bolte
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
—
Richard Jennings
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Skip Potter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Patrick Kirk
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 0
Results13 ties
2021-09-27Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesClaire Thayer / Matt Thayer vs Chiyuki Sugimoto / Chris Blankenship6-2, 6-4
2021-09-26Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesClaire Thayer / Matt Thayer vs Peter Aleman / Denise Dawkins7-6, 6-3
2021-09-25Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesClaire Thayer / Matt Thayer vs Wolf Yeigh / Nancy McGinnis7-6, 6-4
2021-09-25Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesMatt Thayer / Claire Thayer vs Marie Michigami / Erich Mock6-1, 6-3
2021-08-07Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesMatt Bolte / Richard Jennings vs Rolf Ellingsen / John Wallin6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesPatrick Kirk vs Rick Raivio6-4, 6-3
2021-07-25Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMatt Thayer / Matt Bolte vs Dan Tracy / Nick Hooker6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSkip Potter / Larry Corwin vs David Bender / Greg Culver6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPatrick Kirk / Richard Jennings vs Eric Anderson / Robert Glenn6-1, 6-2
2021-07-18Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRichard Jennings / Matt Thayer vs Chris Hasle / Shane Kim6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesPiero Fenato vs Alejandro Kitzis5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMatt Bolte / Patrick Kirk vs Frederick Buckman / Robert Kelly4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-07-11Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesMatt Bolte / Gail Bolte vs Angie Lee / Colin Looi6-2, 7-6
2021-07-10Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesMatt Bolte / Gail Bolte vs Jacqueline Wilcox / Lee Wilcox6-3, 6-3
2021-06-12Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesPaul Stutzman / Matt Thayer vs Derek Carlson / Andalib Khan6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJanis Locenieks vs Harish Krishnamurthy7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPiero Fenato / Richard Jennings vs John Liao / Page Watts1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatrick Kirk / Skip Potter vs NANDA SIDDAIAH / Robert Truong6-0, 6-1
2021-06-11Lost 1–3
W#1 DoublesPaul Stutzman / Matt Thayer vs Xavier Oberlander / Ken Dragoon6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJanis Locenieks vs Shiloh Halsey6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPiero Fenato / John Lekas vs Stefano Cavallucci / Andrew Daddio7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPatrick Kirk / Richard Jennings vs Sam Chase / Michael Navarro7-5, 7-6
2021-06-06Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesPaul Stutzman / Matt Thayer vs Jeff Wheeler / Paul Harwood6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJanis Locenieks vs Mubashir Cheema6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPiero Fenato / John Lekas vs Anish Vidyarthi / Joshua Tran6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRichard Jennings / Skip Potter vs Matt Zhou / Rajan Madhusudan6-2, 6-0
2021-03-05Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesTheresa Fichter / Matt Thayer vs Jordan Keomanivanh / Joyce Wang6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Matt Thayer
91W–63L career
0%94%6%
3.42
3.5
Janis Locenieks
41W–21L career
2%89%9%
3.34
3.5
Piero Fenato
25W–26L career
3%90%8%
3.33
3.5
Matt Bolte
74W–78L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Richard Jennings
40W–66L career
not enough data
—
3
Skip Potter
43W–73L career
0%79%21%
3.00
0
Patrick Kirk
14W–38L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.