Teams

Singh/ARSC 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PM

2025 Piedmont Singles 40+ · 3.0 Women Singles Mon PM

7 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 SinglesLoriAnn Owen vs Allyson Wood6-1, 7-6
W#2 SinglesSharlotte Brooks vs Allison Chisholm6-0, 7-6
W#3 SinglesEmily Owen vs Lorraine Rusch6-3, 5-0
2025-07-14vs Johnson 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesRadha Singh vs Ginger Ballard4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesSharlotte Brooks vs Debbie Johnson5-7, 3-6
L#3 SinglesEmily Owen vs DEBORAH WELLS2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKaren Hardesty vs Cozetta Gaines7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLouise Albright vs Megan Ray6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesLoriAnn Owen vs Allyson Wood6-2, 6-2
2025-06-30vs Busch 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesSharlotte Brooks vs Jennifer Ayers1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLouise Albright vs Tara Rusiewicz6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesEmily Owen vs Liz Busch6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-23vs Johnson 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesSharlotte Brooks vs Ginger Ballard3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesEmily Owen vs Debbie Johnson0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesLoriAnn Owen vs Rebecca Sheppard3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesRadha Singh vs Allison Chisholm6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKaren Hardesty vs Pamela Banister6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesTina Dixon vs Sarah Lopatka6-2, 6-1
2025-06-09vs Busch 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PMLost 12
W#1 SinglesRadha Singh vs Liz Busch6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesLouise Albright vs Kathleen Mooney1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesLoriAnn Owen vs Jennifer Ayers1-6, 4-6
2025-06-02vs Johnson 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PMWon 21
L#1 SinglesKaren Hardesty vs Shannon Hughes6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesEmily Owen vs Jamie Smedsmo6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesTina Dixon vs Courtney OShea6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-05-19vs Busch 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesRadha Singh vs Kathleen Mooney4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSharlotte Brooks vs Jennifer Ayers3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 SinglesLouise Albright vs Tara Rusiewicz4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Singles Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Radha Singh
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.92
Karen Hardesty
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.88
Sharlotte Brooks
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.76
Tina Dixon
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.57
Emily Owen
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.57
LoriAnn Owen
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Louise Albright
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Radha Singh + Tina Dixon404 matchesnot enough data
Radha Singh + Karen Hardesty123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Radha Singh
30W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
Karen Hardesty
17W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Sharlotte Brooks
25W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Tina Dixon
22W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Emily Owen
9W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
LoriAnn Owen
4W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
Louise Albright
3W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.