Teams

Bryant/Newell 3.0 Men

2023 Frederick Adult 18 & Over · Frederick Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

2 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-06-07vs Cady 2.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Alam / Russell Acosta vs Majed Hamawy / Chungchi Yao3-6, 0-6
2023-06-03vs Cady 2.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Alam / Russell Acosta vs Majed Hamawy / Benjamin HAYES3-6, 2-6
2023-05-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Alam / Roderick Valencia vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Roderick Valencia
published
2.80
John Alam
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Roderick Valencia
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.00
3
John Alam
16W–57L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.