Teams

Tampa Palms Hit and Run - A. McKenna

2024 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-20vs HCC Smoke Show - E. FlitmanLost 01
L#3 DoublesPat Morris / Pamela Gonzalez vs Robin Perrone / Anne Marie Lennox1-6, 1-6
2024-05-13vs RiverHills Get a Grip - L. HarrarLost 01
L#3 DoublesPamela Gonzalez / Cindy Sparks vs Ann Dunleavy / Lisa Pascoli5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRisa Blake / Pat Morris vs Carla Chappell / Catalina Perez6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPamela Gonzalez / Cindy Sparks vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-22vs Arbor Greene - C. VanMeterLost 01
L#1 DoublesHyun Kim / Pamela Gonzalez vs Sandra Bell / Denys Hubbard3-6, 3-6
2024-04-15vs Westchase Fireballs - P. HayesLost 02
L#1 DoublesPat Morris / Pamela Gonzalez vs Melissa Bode / Nicole Tamulski2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMary Lewis / Cindy Sparks vs Pamela Hayes / Carmen Fiorito1-6, 2-6
2024-04-08vs Avila - A. StaffordLost 02
L#1 SinglesPat Morris vs Giliane Rifai1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Sparks / Siwon Jang vs Anne Stafford / Joy Themides0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Cille Williams
published 3
2.96
Hyun Kim
published
2.66
Risa Blake
published
2.61
Pamela Woodham
published
2.51
Katherine Grichnik
published
2.41
Pamela Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.33
Anne McKenna
published 3
2.29
Pat Morris
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.23
Cindy Sparks
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.20
Siwon Jang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Sparks + Pat Morris4744% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Sparks + Pamela Gonzalez1543% gamesnot enough data
Pat Morris + Pamela Gonzalez0623% gamesnot enough data
Pat Morris + Siwon Jang123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cille Williams
62W–32L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.02
Hyun Kim
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.96
Risa Blake
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.66
Pamela Woodham
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.61
Katherine Grichnik
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
2.51
Pamela Gonzalez
26W–75L career · 5 lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
2.41
3
Anne McKenna
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
2.33
Pat Morris
31W–89L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Cindy Sparks
48W–86L career · 10 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.23
Siwon Jang
16W–25L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.20
Kasia Dolinska-Timoszuk
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.