Teams

CCTA18/COBB/TLC

Tri-Level 18 & over · Adult Women 2.5, 3.0, 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Mildred Newman
published
3.18
Cynthia Poellnitz
published 3.5
3.18
Lisa Wandrick
published
3.17
Dawn Burke
published 3.5
3.13
Erika Hawley
published 3
3.05
Diana Coyne
published 3
2.76
Stacy Hutcheson
published
2.76
Allison Frank
published 3
Cathleen Cobb
published 3
2.69
Alexi Drago
published 3
2.63
Angeli Lamprecht
published 3
Kayla Byer
published
Madeline Harrell
published
Sabrina Kreps
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kayla Byer + Stacy Hutcheson224 matchesnot enough data
Erika Hawley + Stacy Hutcheson213 matchesnot enough data
Alexi Drago + Stacy Hutcheson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mildred Newman
87W–63L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Cynthia Poellnitz
39W–24L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Lisa Wandrick
16W–12L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Dawn Burke
26W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.17
3
Erika Hawley
49W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.13
3
Diana Coyne
63W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
Stacy Hutcheson
32W–30L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Allison Frank
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Cathleen Cobb
4W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Alexi Drago
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Angeli Lamprecht
19W–26L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
Kayla Byer
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Madeline Harrell
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sabrina Kreps
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.