Teams

Wood, Courtney

2026 Mixed 18 & Over-JXN · 3.0 Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-01vs Williamson, BlairLost 03
L#1 DoublesTravis Pope / Kaytlin Benzel vs Stephen Baldwyn / Jaden Taylor1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLauren Ayers / Chip Haynes vs Blair Williamson / Brittany Myers1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusanne Still / Jonathan Still vs Caleb Foxworth / BRITTANY MORALES1-6, 2-6
2026-06-17vs Stewart, KaitiLost 03
L#1 DoublesMeghan Brock / Jack Sims vs adam alexander / Temekia Jackson3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSusanne Still / Jonathan Still vs Joseph Boler / Mary Kennedy Hand3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Vaughn / Chip Haynes vs James Robinson / Robynne Shields6-1, 0-6, 0-1
2026-06-11vs Holt, RobbieLost 12
L#1 DoublesCourtney Wood / Jake Ponder vs Gena Holley / Robbie Holt4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Ayers / Jack Wood vs Lydia Walters / Eric Walters7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKaytlin Benzel / Jack Sims vs Amy Adcox / Wade Hawkins3-6, 2-6
2026-06-10vs Bayati, MitraLost 03
L#1 DoublesTravis Pope / Lauren Ayers vs Olivia Barnard / Matthew Weeks2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCourtney Wood / Jack Wood vs Alexandria Sylvester / James Johnson2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSusanne Still / Jonathan Still vs Cece Sherrod / Michael Barnard0-6, 3-6
2026-06-03vs Simmons, ClaireLost 02
L#1 DoublesJacob Vaughn / Jennifer Vaughn vs Sydney Smith / Chris Varner2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaytlin Benzel / Chip Haynes vs Devan Bucklew / Skye Jones1-6, 1-6
2026-05-27vs Stewart, NeilWon 30
W#1 DoublesLauren Buckalew / Travis Pope vs Hayden Perkins / Mary Parker Plunkett6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Vaughn / Jacob Vaughn vs John Jeffreys / Emily Ann Riley4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Ayers / Chip Haynes vs Webb Strickland / Everett Heard7-6, 7-5
2026-05-14vs Reiss, BethWon 21
L#1 DoublesCourtney Wood / Chip Haynes vs Claudia Stokes / Troy Stokes6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKaytlin Benzel / Jack Sims vs Allison Wallace / Aaron Wallace6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLauren Buckalew / Jake Ponder vs Beth Reiss / Ron Reiss6-1, 6-1
2026-05-13vs Hardy, KristinLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Vaughn / Jacob Vaughn vs Ashley Smith / Taylor Byrd1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusanne Still / Jonathan Still vs Mary Wilsford Hodges / Thomas Tynes6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLauren Ayers / Travis Pope vs Jill Webb / Micah Thomas6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Williamson, Blair712049129
2Simmons, Claire7120412161
3Holt, Robbie44101430228
4Stewart, Neil3581634233
5Wood, Courtney2671735242
6Hardy, Kristin2661838255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Jennifer Vaughn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.65
Lauren Ayers
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.45
Jack Sims
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.35
Kaytlin Benzel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.24
Courtney Wood
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.22
Chip Haynes
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Jack Wood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jacob Vaughn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jake Ponder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jonathan Still
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lauren Buckalew
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Meghan Brock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susanne Still
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Travis Pope
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susanne Still + Jonathan Still044 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Vaughn + Jacob Vaughn123 matchesnot enough data
Jake Ponder + Courtney Wood123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Vaughn
6W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.67
Lauren Ayers
8W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.65
Jack Sims
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.45
Kaytlin Benzel
18W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Courtney Wood
3W–11L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Chip Haynes
1W–8L career · type M · 5 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Jack Wood
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jacob Vaughn
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jake Ponder
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jonathan Still
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lauren Buckalew
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Meghan Brock
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Susanne Still
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Travis Pope
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.