Teams

WNCW Brians (Aston Park)

Combo 40 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 40+ Men 7.5 Combo Thurs

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-27vs WNCC Still (HRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRhett Johnson / Brian Strandtman vs Dave Kroondyk / Chris Bull0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJon Serenius / John Hall vs Keith Johnson / Ben Huggins1-6, 1-6
2026-08-20vs WNCC Still (HRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJon Serenius / Brian Strandtman vs Jonathan Jackson / William Krueger1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Shanklin / John Hall vs Andrew McIntyre / Chris Westmoreland0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesWinfield Brians / Benjamin Brock vs William Jimenez / Brian Frellick3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-11vs WNCC Still (HRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJon Serenius / John Hall vs Chris Bull / William Krueger0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWinfield Brians / Jeff Bell vs Jonathan Jackson / Dave Kroondyk1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTim Peara / Robert Shanklin vs Jeff Futch / Chris Westmoreland0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 40+ Men 7.5 Combo Thurs
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WNCW Brians (Aston Park)0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Jeff Bell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Benjamin Brock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Winfield Brians
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
David Kreeger
published 3.5
3.21
Brian Strandtman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Gabriel Noboa
published
2.73
Tim Peara
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jon Serenius
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rhett Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Shanklin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Benjamin Brock + Winfield Brians224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Bell
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Benjamin Brock
16W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
1%84%15%
3.35
Winfield Brians
19W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
David Kreeger
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Brian Strandtman
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Gabriel Noboa
6W–8L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.09
Tim Peara
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Jon Serenius
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rhett Johnson
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Robert Shanklin
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.